Hey mb |waves|
Firstly Hoes has always been in my top ref for months. |headbang|

I don't duplicate my site and this is why I use 25 recips. Unduplicated sites always get much much higher serps which is good for both of us. On the other side if I only used 20 recips I won't get any traffic and I'll have to wait for months to get some SE traffic. :(

I could easily duplicate the site and use less recips/page but that is not good for the long run.
Google hates nothing more than those duplicated sites on the same domain on the same host. |dizzy|

Almost every LL accepted the site. |pink
25 from 20 is not a big deal ;) . Besides your recip is on the best position |thumb

Hi MB didnt see a acceptance email for this one http://www.nastylovingslut.com/big_cock_sex/

thanks

Hi,

We've noticed recip tables getting bigger and bigger. In my opinion, it makes the page look very spammy and google certainly doesn't like recip spam. I think it would be better for you to make one additional mirror of your page and put the very small linklists on that mirror.

Even though your site is clean, we have to enforce our rules to maintain a clean, organized directory.

Additionaly, your use of "CLICK HERE" all over the place before you get to the actual ENTER link would get the site deleted. We are really cracking down on that right now.

marc

Thx Marc for the reply |headbang|

But my tables are not that big.
The page could look spammy even with 15 recips. There are a lot of LL with big recips and image recips that would make a page look very unfriendly and spammy. And there's a lot of sites listed with much bigger recip tables.

But this is not spam. A lot of LL have more than 25 link exchange and they are not spamming SE. As long as the text is unique and the page is getting links from big sites, SE won't see that as spamming. Instead SE will see those duplicate site as spamming even if they have only 5-6 recips.
Besides, I only use two links for every LL while some LL have 4-5 links in their recipe code.

But there's no small LL on the recip table :) Those are the biggest 25 LL according to Alexa rankings and Google PR ;)

I do understand this :) You have such a great site and you have to keep it clean

I don't use "CLICK HERE" as a blind link. I alway use "Click Here for....." which is totally different. I always describe for the surfer what he's going to find. Surfers always tend to finish reading the description and then return back and click the link if they are interested. And from my stats I can see that those who were really interested clicked the links ;)

And almost every banner has click here and they are accepted. Would you reject sites with banners that have click here or should I just open ImageReady and save click here in a gif file?
IMO there's always rules and there's a lot of ways to go around them and this is why there are human reviewers :)

Have a nice day Marc
Magnoody
ICQ : 331-273-525

I'm sorry man, but the two "CLICK HERE" links at the top of this site are definately blind in my opinion:
http://blacksexfiles.com/black-slut/

The reason I say they are blind is because a surfer is visiting your site through a link that refers to something "black", whether it is "black girls", "black pussy", "black sex", etc... So, they click on that link and see your site. Immediately they see "Click Here" to check some black and ebony girls. Well, that surfer is going to click on that because they think that's where they will see the content you said they were going to get when they clicked on your link to visit your site. They might not even see the ENTER link way down the page. It sets them up for failure immediately and I consider it blind.

Banner ads are banner ads... They look like ads and are not misleading. I don't care if the banner has "click here" in the banner somewhere. It's obvious that it's an ad. But I delete sites all the time that have a banner with "Click Here" right below it. Unless it says "Click Here" to visit "nameofsiteinbanner", or some other marketing message, it's considered blind.

I want the surfer to see the ENTER link. If they like the site you are advertising, they will click on it, if not, they will click ENTER and go to the next page that has more banners/ads on it. And on and on. That's the beauty of the free site. You can show ads many times during their process of viewing some free porn. Free sites are more than generous in the amount off advertising space they have available and linklists are more than generous for allowing them to advertise so much. But, linklists have to have rules to control spam or the free sites could turn into downtown Tokyo.

Regarding the number of recips... I'm sorry, our rule is 20 and we have to keep it that way. Trim off 5 tiny linklists and you probably won't notice any difference. Trim off hoes.com and keep those 5 and you will notice a big difference.

marc

hey mb you see my post a few back ?

|waves|

Thx marc for taking the time replying to my questions :)
I'll build some free sites without click here and see if the CT will drop.
And I'll keep an eye on my ref stats for the next 2 weeks and remove those that sent the least traffic.
But I think there are already fs qeued for review. If you found one breaking the rules reject it, no hard feelings :)

|pink |pink |pink

Chuck/Marc,

Whats the status of my domain, fingermyvagina.com now?

I've never used popups and I don't understand how that could have happened. Looking at the source again, there is no way that freesite could have popped anything.

Thanks again

Xander

Hi platement...I don't know why it wasn't accepted. Feel free to submit it again. I'll make sure it gets through this time. Do me a favor and place a comment about the resubmit in the notes field for me just as a reminder. Thanks!

Chuck

Hi Xander...The freesite in question: http://www.fingermyvagina.com/married-cheating-wives/
redirects to a tgp now.

Chuck

Hey Chuck, it should have been this URL: http://www.fingermyvagina.com/married-women-cheating/

Not sure where the URL you have came from?

Thanks, Xander

Hi Xander...I apologize for the mistake on my part. The URL submitted that prompted the blacklisting was not: http://www.fingermyvagina.com/married-women-cheating/
It was actually: http://www.fingermyvagina.com/married-cheating-wives/

Chuck

I know what happened then, in that case. I submitted the wrong URL to you guys back when I had a 404 popup, and thats what you saw.

I hope that clears it up, was a dumb mistake on my part getting confused and typing the wrong URL into your form.

Thanks for the clarification,

Xander

I understand and will take you off the blacklist. Please note that you would never get a free site accepted that had a recip to "onlybestsex". They use four links in their recip.

Please try to put hoes.com with the other large linklists.

thanks,

marc

Hi mb or mezzanine,

I haven't had much luck lately,

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ing/index.html

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ssy/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/muffdivers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/hornymom/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/bigfunbags/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/ebo...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/but...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/int...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/chubbychick/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/pus...ers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/fuckfest/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/tightteen/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/plu...ssy/index.html

I haven't got acceptance or decline e-mails for these. Any help would be appreciated, thanks
Jay
tjchuck

Hi tjchuck...These sites are still in our queue waiting to be reviewed:

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ing/index.html

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ssy/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/but...ing/index.html

These sites containt content we've already had submitted to us in the past:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/hornymom/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/ebo...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/int...ing/index.html

This one has a broken recip link in the recip table:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/plu...ssy/index.html

These sites were accepted:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/chubbychick/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/pus...ers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/tightteen/index.html

I don't know why these weren't accepted:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/bigfunbags/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/fuckfest/index.html

Feel free to resubmit these and I'll make sure they're accepted.

Chuck

Thanks Chuck,
Have a good weekend |cheers|

Marc, Could you please check your pm when you get a chance? I'd really appreciate it :)

http://www.paradisebikinis.com/jesse-capelli2/

I submitted that to the panties cateogry by mistake (out of habit) and then resubmitted to the correct babes category.

Sorry bout that.

Thanks for the heads up neveremail!

Chuck

just checked it for ya...

Thanks Marc, I did get your reply and emailed you the info a week ago and just waiting to hear back. Thanks again and have a great day :)

Hey MB i was just wondering why a few of my sites werent listed at Hoes.com. If u could please tell me whats wrong with them so I know for future references while building my freesites. Here are the URLs:

http://www.pornokingpin.com/fs/amateur/aa/

http://www.pornokingpin.com/fs/amateur/cab/

http://www.pornokingpin.com/fs/amateur/sab/

Thanks.

hey guys could you please take a look at this site it hasn't been add to your sites (Hoes + Sexy Sites)
http://www.adultlinksfordummies.com/page25/
thx.

Hi Scooter...I passed over your site because of blind links. The first page has a link stating 'Free Porn Galleries' and the second page contains a link reading 'CLICK HERE TO GET INSTANT ACCESS!' Neither of which take the surfer to the free content they're looking for.

Chuck