Hey Greenie. I only checked the first one but I got 10 seconds in Power DVD and WMP10.

gosh, my first submission to you rejected!|huh |cry|
Here is/was the url http://www.dawgsgaylinks.com/free/big_cock/
Anyway thanks for the feedback

What was the rejection reason?

This is all the email had on it:
Your submission:
Site Name: Steve's Huge Cock
Site URL: http://www.dawgsgaylinks.com/free/big_cock/
Category: GayBigCocks

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Other - Please Contact Webmaster

Please go to this page for more information:
http://www.link-o-rama.com/greenguy/rejected.htm

I'm sure it had nothing to do with the Domains by Proxy, third-party counter, ancient recips, or the fact that you most likely don't have a partner account at DDave or Jurbi.

Yup - that pretty much sums it up.

Well, those make sense. I originally did this format in '04 or early '05. Did free sites for a few months and quit. Since gallery submissions haven't been working, I thought I'd start the F/S again. I was able to submit at DD then and didn't realise Jurbi was partner only until I had already started.
most of those allowed me to submit and I wasn't sure what effect it would have to change the links after submission.

Domains by Proxy-is that a major issue? I have a bunch of sites and all are " private registration". My first domain was "public" and within a few weeks I was getting a lot of strange mail and calls at home.Everything has been private since then.

Third party counters- not at all or can they be invisible? I just link their stats format better than webairs.

Domains by proxy seems to be the only one I can't correct

Will that be a killer?

Sorry to move in on this thread again please delete or move if I am in the wrong place. Until UW pointed out the domain name issue to me I never realised, something I know I shall have to change. Are DDave and Jurbi no no's then? Also UW please can you tell me which link list is yours..

Thanks
Tina

No, the exact opposite actually. But they are not the easiest places from which to get partner accounts. Seeing that Dodger doesn't read rules pages, I surmised that he wouldn't have accounts at those excellent lists.
Why, are you looking for a new table recip to copy?
|couch|

No reason to get sarcastic about it.Here is Jurbi's page: http://www.jurbi.com/addasite.html

Top of the page said:
Jurbi has re-opened to outside submissions.

PLEASE NOTE - The only sites that will be accepted are quality sites constructed by experienced and knowledgeable webmasters.

(OK so I don't quite meet the experienced and knowledgeable part....)

I do see at the bottom of the page about partner accounts, didn't read that far.
reviewing the link o rama rules I see this:
#18 No sites with 3rd party counters will be listed. Get some stats on your server.

I hadn't noticed that and can fix it.

No I apologised and I even contacted the person myself telling them I had been accused of copying their table. I hold my hands-up I did not want to face the truth that it was a copy at first although I swear it was not me who copied it and I was not 100% sure what you were talking about when you first mentioned it.. I asked someone who designed my logo to do a banner for me at the same time and he supplied the code saying that this was what people were using instead of banners. We all make mistakes, some learn from them, others don't, I removed the offending table the same day as you told me about it.

I am hoping to go the route of freesites and I am trying to take everything on board first before I do. I know you do not like me, that is your choice and if the only reason is because I questioned you about the table when you mentioned it then again, I publically apologise to you. I just wanted to know which link list was yours so I could take a look at the accepted submissions.

Back to my original question or at least part of it. |loony|

How much of a problem is the domain thing? Even the Hun accepted one of my post with an explaination.

or will it be easier to purchase a single domain with public registration and put all f/s, galleries,etc.?

or will that be an issue?

(Hell, I thought this would be easy)|shocking|

The hidden domain info thing is a touchy issue - some think you should be able to hide your info, but that leads to us not being able to easily track down spammers or scammers or multisubmitters.

Plus we are all running legit business's, so your company's info being on a whois should not be that big of a deal.

Hey Greenguy, got this rejection e-mail today:

Site URL: http://www.erotic-faq.com/sban/blonde/oral/
Category: MatureSex
Has been rejected and it will not be listed.
Reason: Connection Issues

I've checked it - all OK.|huh
Thanks

Croupier - If it's back up now, feel free to resubmit it.

OK|bananna|
Thanks

Hi Greenie

The following site was rejected because the site does not match category:

http://myfree-porn.com/freesites/Cumsuckers/

What category do you suggest I slot it under to get included at link-o-rama.

Tx

I could throw it in "misc" but that's really a waste of time IMHO. You really need more pics with cum in them.

On Gallery 1, you have 10 softcore pics, 1 cock sucking pic & 5 borderline facial pics (and I think some of the cum was added to the pics after-the-fact)

Gallery 2 is pretty much the same, except the cum pics are more cum-swapping than facials.

This site was rejected for: "Site does not match catagory". It's a squirting site and she squirts.

http://www.best-wet-pussy.com/awesome-squirting-orgasm/

Licker - it should have been rejected for Vid Caps, but I'm also going to go out on a limb & say that the last 5 pics are fake (not by you, but I find it really hard to believe that she's not moving at all, especially with her mouth open & that look on her face)

Your submission:
Site Name: Giantic Babe Vids
Site URL: http://www.xxx-vip.com/bbw/bbw6/
Category: BBWSex

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
120 Seconds Movie Rule

8x15=120 , where is the problem ???

The first video is 10 seconds in WMP10

When I reviewed it they are showing 11 seconds each for me :(

hmm... i used winamp and there were 15 sec. each movie :(

I reviewed them with WMP and thats pretty much the standard.