Traffic out has been by-far the best traffic I have bought from any site. (Although they dont allow pay sites.)

I have also been messing around with Google Adword with mixed results. Like someone already said, it's trial and error.

I also sell PPC traffic from Drbizzaro (and a small network of my sites) that people seem to be very pleased about. (Actual links and banner clicked traffic. No pop-up's, or blind traffic.)

I can attest to that, nothing beats Dr Bizzaro's quality traffic. :)

agree. traffic out is good guy runs a good show. hey drbizzaro :)

I buy tgp feeder traffic from traffic-out.com which is very productive. Also have tried fpctraffic which is not as productive but pretty cheap, so I'd say I am happy with that one too.
For gallery traffic I get submit passes.

Mark

what about selling top spots for movie galleries?

I guess I could do that, I never sold em before

if your intersted email me
tommy at tommysbookmarks dot com

Well I tried 20000 hits from FPC (yes it was cheap) but I don't seem to have any sales I can directly attribute to it. However I gained some new submitters which is cool and I think some bookmarkers.
This week I have bought some from choker. Its the general traffic for free sites/ paysites. Costs a lot more but hopefully it will perform accordingly.
I will check out DrBizzaros next I think.

If anyone is reading this thread and itching to post spam for their traffic site then please go to the thread I just started on the spam board and post your spam there. The thread is "Gallery Posters And Traffic Sellers Please Read This".

http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=18075

Trafficrouter - http://www.adult.trafficrouter.com is a pretty good system, you can buy and sell traffic direct from webmasters in an auction system with real time delivery. Theres occasionally some expired domain traffic there that works pretty well for paysites

I get very suspicious of anything that expects you to sign up before you can read the FAQ, but http://www.adult.trafficrouter.com seem to go one step further and expect you to agree to their terms and conditions before you can read them.

If this is an honest company it must be the worst designed site I have ever seen.

ecchi: I agree that trafficrouter's site may be a little bit confusing; it took me a while to figure out what is was all about. But, now that I've been using it for a few weeks, I'm very impressed with it. It's a great system to both buy and sell traffic.

For your info, there is a link to the terms on their main page, and you can use a guest login to see the inside of the site.

RE: "you can use a guest login to see the inside of the site" - Yes, but if you use it then try to look at the FAQ (or any other page of the type you would want to see before signing up) you get redirected to the sign up page.

I wasn't aware of that. It certainly is a strange way to set up a site.

From everyone I have ever spoken to about it, Choker has a tremendous reputation for delivering a quality product. |headbang|

The Trafficrouter front end is a bit rough - it was designed in Linux by a C programmer in raw html is the current excuse. But the functionality is there - once you get used to it you see its like a big mixing deck for traffic - you can turn traffic off and on to your site in any amount from any supplier and it responds in seconds. All the traffic is 3rd party sources and theres some real gems in there if you look for it. There are guys with great quality expired domain traffic that are selling - using Trafficrouter rather than building their own distribution network.

RE: "But the functionality is there" - So where do I find the FAQ ?

RE: "was designed in Linux by a C programmer in raw HTML is the current excuse" - You know when you go to a garage and the mechanic tries to rip you off by using long explanations peppered with technical words he does not think you will understand so he can charge you three hundred dollars to clean a spark plug ("The ark gap had become infiltrated with extraneous material causing the resistance to the electrical flow to increase to the point where electrical discharge is negligible and combustion of the vapourised fuel product was prevented"). Well that only works if the person he is talking to knows nothing about mechanics. The same applies to web design. And as this is a webmaster board it is probably fair to assume that everyone reading this board will know that the OS he uses is about as relevant as the type of wallpaper on his office wall. His ability to program C, although impressive to some (not all, I used to program directly in machine code years ago) it is similarly irrelevant. And although some people here use a WYSIWYG editor, most of us program in "raw HTML" (but would never be pretentious enough to use the adjective "raw"). In other words your impressive techno speak is not impressive here, and fools no one on a WM board.

Sorry if I am being harsh, but when I made my first post I expected people from the site either to ignore me or explain where the FAQ was and why I was wrong to condemn your site. What I did not expect you to do was come out with pseudo-techno-babble and a post that came right out of a "Marketing 101" manual. Not only do we all know what we are talking about WRT web design but most of us have also read the marketing book as well. I actually feel quite insulted (both for myself and the board) that you though us green enough for that post to work.

phew - yes that was a bit harsh! The faq has just been connected up so you can read it using the guest account now. We're still working on marketing and user interface side of things :)