so all 40 year old men will think its OK to sleep with 10 year olds now.

fucking rediculous

Nothing is black and nothing is white...

way to go California another guilty famous person walking free

If I gave booze to a minor I would be found guilty.

MJ is special?

Fucking blows.

Disgusting.

Alex

so when famous you can get away with it all, mmmmmmm which remind me of an other famous judge thing that time, the guy who was blamed for killing his wife and her lover and got away with it, also very fmous what was his name???? me laughing:D

Good for MJ! That family that attacked him were obviously scum bags and they were proven to be liars over and over again on the witness stand. The prosecution tried to use the fact that he owns porn mags as some kind of proof that he was guilty. The only thing he is guilty of is being one really strange dude.

If you admitted sleeping with a 10 year old you would be guilty, if you showed up to court late wearing your pj's you would be guilty.....

Unless you are rich.

yeah right and its normal to sleep with a ten year old too.......and now m choking US LAW SUCKS HUGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, grin i can say that me in holland :D get me

If he was not rich he would not be sued.

That's actually really fucking funny :D

I think it's obvious from the 2257 threads that a lot of webmasters, especially those that aren't in the USA, don't understand how our legal system works. The system worked properly this time, but all too often you have to be wealthy to make it work right.

it is hard to picture MJ in prison

I am hearing something about that kids family trying to get money out of JCpenny
and I heard something about them trying to get money out of Jay Lenoe

so who knows

LOL, I did not mean HIM :D

Sleeping in the same bed as a 10-year-old doesn't make you a child molester, neither does showing up in court in PJs.

MJ no doubt is an eccentric, arguably with very poor judgement at times. But a child molester? The judicial system requires proof beyond reasonable doubt and the accusers couldn't come up with that. IMO the system worked.

My point is, as shown in a skit on politically incorrect, was get any joe blow off the street and have him do the same shit MJ has done, let him going around holding 10 yr old boys hands and sleeping in the same bed and then bragging about it on tv.

Tell me he would not have been convicted if he was then brought up on the same charges MJ was.

Doesn’t matter if he actually molested the boys or not, the jury would have convicted him, but since MJ is a world star they think it’s natural and “eccentric” so it’s ok for him to do it.

He may not have molested this boy, but would you have paid millions of dollars 10 years ago if you did nothing wrong?

I think not.

Don't be silly.
Janet is black.
Michael is white.
Janet has the black bustier that falls apart.
Michael has the white nose that falls apart.

I think the problem with those charges were that they carried the stipulation of "in (during?) the commission of a felony" and since he was found not guilty on the felony charges....

Maybe he thought it is worth for him to pay out that boy and to live in peace, without any stress at court. And now he said it was enough, I can not pay out all childern who were ever in Neverland, lets go to court and see if I am guilty or not. Maybe.

OJ is innocent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ooops I mean

MJ is innocent!!!!!!!!!!


there will probably be a civil lawsuit filed and he will be found guilty and ordered to pay another assload of money just like OJ

If the system works differently for poor and rich, which I am sure it does, and the poor guy gets convicted when the evidence doesn't support it, then yes, the system is faulty. But what I'm reading between the lines here is that MJ should suffer the same injustice because he's rich.

MJ is easy target, if I would tell to some newspaper that MJ molested me in Neverland, I would probably make a lot of $$$ from interviews sooner, then someone would notice, that I have never been in USA :)

at least at our system you get some jail, famouse or not:D

I think the guy is just having some real mental issues. I mean you watch the specials and he's like in his 40's and having kids climb trees with him and sleep with him. He may fit the profile 100% of a camp counsler/CP lover. But I really feel good about the ruling. 12 people saw what they saw and made their choice on logic and evidence. On OJ that was differant. If memory serves there was DNA in that case which made everything think 100% the juice had to have done it. But in the MJ case doubt is all you need. I mean I was not in the house and I'm pretty sure most everyone here was not there either. I wish I was. A little touchy touchy from MJ might make me moonwalk to the bank. But I guess not this time.

Oh one last thing. How many of you will watch the interview with him? lol I know I'll be glued to the tv cause it will be just Charming, thats all, not sexual, just Charrrrrrrming

Juggernaut I think you got issues LOL if you think any interview wacko jacko gives as Chaaaaarrrrrrming