Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Search Engines (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   PR Question (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=329)

DangerDave 2003-08-31 10:30 PM

Syke - MONKEY!! hahahaha made me laugh... Pigsy, Sandy... was funny stuff. :D

Linkster.. for sure.. and its actually easily doable.. with a little persistence and patience.

No Urb... it justs "de-rank's" YOUR stuff.. its the anti-urb algorithm ! or is that the ConePauper algorithm! |shocking|

|bananna|

DD

mist 2003-09-01 12:01 AM

I found this page,10 Google Myths Revealed as I was searching for info about PR on google. Quite interesting reading.

urb 2003-09-01 02:04 AM

DangerDave :D

Linkster :)

One of the best ones used to be
Janes Guide but I think she dropped to a PR6 recently.

Also AVN is now PR6.

The mighty Tommys-Bookmarks, Greenguy and DangerDave only ever seem to maintain PR6. When in reality they should be higher.

I'd love to see an adult PR7. But I presume it's not possible???

urb 2003-09-01 02:19 AM

Like I said, I'd love to see an adult PR7+ anyone know any?

I have one domain which just hit the deck PR0 |skull| , but strangely has found reasonable traffic from Yahoo! instead. Not to mention that if your site is worth returning to, you can get bookmarkers.

Which goes to prove that there is life after PR.

Linkster 2003-09-01 06:24 AM

asacp is one that I can think of thats a 7 under the adult directory...for good reason :)

All the others that used to be 8's (there was an adult humor blog that you could get listed in pretty easily) have lost 2 PR points in the last 6 months.
AVN kinda surprised me but they recently did a face lift so maybe they havent re-optimized very much :) they dropped all of the link exchanges they had and have started over, which probably affected them the most

Urb...Ive seen Yahoo experimenting with Inktomi results instead of Google a couple of times....nice boost too :) hopefully a shot of things to come...

DangerDave 2003-09-01 02:44 PM

Hmmmmmm interesting Urb.. I hadn't seen that Janes and AVN dropped...

Wonder what the story is behind that...... ???


mist - IMO some of those "myths revealed" are WRONG... always be careful when you read stuff about Google..

Lots of people have lots of opinions..

Quote:

"This myth is left over from the days when most search engines used meta tags."
Umm when did the SE's stop using Metas??? Sheesh... Google aint that dominant.!


Urb, I too have 0 and unranked domains that get decent yahoo traffic.. often they have been picked up on one Googlebot run , and then dropped on the next.. but they still appear in their mirrors... Yahoo, AOL,etc.

DD

RawAlex 2003-09-01 03:43 PM

DD: Not only is Google not the only search engine out there, but as Yahoo moved away from Google results, their power will drop... and all things will change again.

There really is alot of shakeup on the horizon, with the MSN bot hard at work, Yahoo switching to Inktomi, and altavista actually seeing some traffic again.

Anyone else miss the days of Excite and Infoseek? :-)


On PR, I think that Jane's might have lost some "newer links" because of the charge for review process they have been using. I rarely see a new site submitted anymore with a Jane's link on it, and for the most part, it appears to be more non-commercial personality stroking labour of love sites, most of which I don't list because they just don't match up to what I am looking for. Just as importantly, alot of freehosted and "marginal" hosted sites have dropped in the last 6 - 12 months, and many of those are those exact "personality" sites that Jane's seems to enjoy listing. As they drop, they lose backlinks and in the long run, lose PR.

Anyway, back to making generic, money making porn sites. :-)

Alex

Syke 2003-09-01 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by urb

I'd love to see an adult PR7. But I presume it's not possible???

pornresource.com was 7 a while ago and http://www.thumbzilla.com shows 7 for me right now.

DangerDave 2003-09-01 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RawAlex
On PR, I think that Jane's might have lost some "newer links" because of the charge for review process....
That would make sense..:(

DD

urb 2003-09-02 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Syke
pornresource.com was 7 a while ago and http://www.thumbzilla.com shows 7 for me right now.
Nice one :D

Zilla = 2,190 backward links (PR7)
Jennys = 2,190 backward links (PR6)
Al4a = 2,040 backward links (PR6)
JanesG = 1,170 backward links (PR6)
RRealm = 1,100 backward links (PR6)
GGuy = 954 backward links (PR6)
PKitty = 820 backward links (PR6)
Tommy = 601 backward links (PR6)
Shemp = 572 backward links (PR6)
DDave = 320 backward links (PR6)

But there's a few which are not following the pattern
an example being.....

DrBizzaro = 1,840 backward links (PR5)

Maybe PR is not always relative to backward links.

DangerDave 2003-09-02 05:18 AM

Interesting Urb :D

http://www.persiankitty.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 711 already displayed. (820) - 0.86
http://www.shemp.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 461 already displayed.(572) - 0.81
http://www.tommys-bookmarks.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 474 already displayed. (601) - 0.79
http://www.link-o-rama.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 703 already displayed. (954) - 0.73
http://www.dangerdave.com.au/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 232 already displayed.(320) - 0.72
http://www.richards-realm.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 783 already displayed. (1100) - 0.71
http://www.janesguide.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 791 already displayed (1170) - 0.66
http://www.thumbzilla.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 477 already displayed.(2190) - 0.21
http://www.jennysbookmarks.com - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 273 already displayed.(2190) - 0.12
http://www.al4a.com/ - we have omitted some entries very similar to the 80 already displayed. (2040) - 0.04

DD

Nige 2003-09-02 05:21 AM

http://www.xnxx.com/ - 369 backward links - PR 8

Syke 2003-09-02 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nige
http://www.xnxx.com/ - 369 backward links - PR 8
wow.. nice site.

urb 2003-09-02 08:43 AM

PR8 can only be described as being impressive. :D

That's the highest adult PR I've ever seen.

Please also see....
http://www.alexa.com/data/details?url=xnxx.com

RawAlex 2003-09-02 10:20 AM

PR 8 mostly because of link exchanges with alot of PR6 and PR7 sites... which should make the site an "authority" site, which gives it a higher PR. It is the same PR as foxnews.com, as an example!

PR8 for an adult site is rare, and there probably isn't more than a couple.

This site is rare also that it has fairly high traffic as well, unlike alot of high PR / low traffic sites out there.

Alex

Linkster 2003-09-02 03:12 PM

89.com just another 7 - goes to show a data feed of DMOZ and ATW does well...of course the sponsor status at Google probably doesnt hurt (Adwords)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc