Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   General Business Knowledge (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   I'm As Mad As Hell, And I'm Not Going To Take This Anymore! (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=48156)

Greenguy 2008-07-28 04:22 PM

Toby - be honest :) Did you know that, when posting:
You have the option to not show your sig?
You can turn off smileys?
You can attach a file?
You can rate a thread?
You can choose to subscribe to a thread?

All these "Additional Options" are located below the "Submit Reply" button when you reply to a thread :)

faxxaff 2008-07-28 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toby (Post 411818)
I'm not banning all sponsors with pre-checks, just those sponsors that have them placed below the submit button.

I think that is appropriate. Programs that post pre-checked boxes under the join/purchase button are trying to hide this from the surfer or at least they hope they will not notice.

A few years back Ibill and a few AVS had this practice of doing the same thing. If I recall correctly they made the text with the pre-checks far smaller to make sure no one would have a chance of reading them.

It's certainly a very questionable way of making money imho. I would never promote a sponsor if I knew they were playing such tricky games.

Useless 2008-07-28 04:51 PM

I don't really have much to offer here except that I am in agreement with Toby. Having the pre-checks below the submit button and/or below the fold is deceptive. The entire purpose of asterisks and fine print is for the purpose of deception, just like their placement on the page AND the fact that they are PRE-CHECKED in the first place. There's plenty of room for the true costs to be right there with the pre-checks and there's plenty of space for additional offers at the top of the form instead of below the submit button.

Professional marketers study advertising statistics. They know that HUGE amounts of surfers do not scroll below the fold for further information (only 10% did earlier in this decade) or read fine print. Sure, we webmasters realize how dangerous it is to place trust in sponsor programs, but a horny surfer doesn't know what we know, nor is he or she in their correct state of mind, at least not if we did our job correctly. ;) Is it the surfers fault for being lazy or ignorant? Perhaps, but that doesn't make it ethical for a program to take advantage of that ignorance.

Ok, I have to go to my telemarketing job now and see if I can sell some supplemental life insurance to senior citizens who aren't eligible for the benefits, but at least they can afford it. |thumb

Toby 2008-07-28 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie (Post 411821)
Toby - be honest :) Did you know that, when posting:
You have the option to not show your sig?
You can turn off smileys?
You can attach a file?
You can rate a thread?
You can choose to subscribe to a thread?

All these "Additional Options" are located below the "Submit Reply" button when you reply to a thread :)

But there's no money being taken from my credit card if I fail to notice.

papagmp 2008-07-28 05:18 PM

Hey - I wanna put the "Enter" link above the LL recip table on all my Free Sites and make sure the table starts at say the 800th pixel from the top. Of course, all my adds will be within the first 768 pixels. |couch|

Greenguy 2008-07-28 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papagmp (Post 411834)
Hey - I wanna put the "Enter" link above the LL recip table on all my Free Sites...

I never said I didn't have inconsistencies :D

BTW - I completely understand what everyone is saying, I just don't think it's that big of a deal. Consoles, on the other hand, pop regardless of any boxes being checked & that annoys the living shit out of me.

The world of advertising & marketing lives off stupid people. If it's on sale 2 for $5, you'll buy 2 even if you only need 1, which costs $2.50. I do this EVERY time I go to the grocery store. Why? Because I'm a dummy.

SykkBoy 2008-07-28 05:40 PM

I only wish we could have cancellation policies like AOL has ;-)

In all fairness, affiliates can choose who they promote. If they choose to not promote us because of pre-checked cross sales, I'll wish them well and tell them to go ahead and promote another sponsors. Those that love the checks they receive from us and the size of them as well as everything we offer are more than welcome to keep continuing to send us traffic.

Everyone has the right to decide who they will conduct business and who they will conduct business with. No one should let people on a message board dictate to them how they should run their business. They need to decide for themselves and even though Toby and I probably disagree, at least he's willing to state publicly his intentions to pull links and really, let's see if he does. I would never tell anyone how to conduct business nor should anyone listen to me in such regards (unless they want to send to us and earn big checks ;-)).

Greenguy 2008-07-28 05:51 PM

I tell people how to conduct their business all the time & everyone loves me! |couch|

Banning a sponsor is BIG, regardless of how big your site is. I've only done it twice: Epic Cash & Ultra Cash - and I think everyone can agree that I had VERY valid reasons for each.

I completely understand what Toby's doing. I sometimes wish there was an option to turn it off & take a lower payout like programs do with consoles.

But, this is a BIG part of the PPS business model & I'm a PPS kinda guy |thumb

Greenguy 2008-07-28 05:53 PM

Toby - before I forget, great topic & I love the anger.

It's also perfect timing for a long board discussion seeing as it's Monday. If this thread started on a Friday, no one would remember it Monday morning :)

Toby 2008-07-28 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SykkBoy (Post 411844)
Toby and I probably disagree, at least he's willing to state publicly his intentions to pull links and really, let's see if he does.

Well, that's where I differ from the board warriors over on GFY. I had either never promoted said sponsors or had already pulled any links long before I started this thread.

Brazzers and AFF were already on my banned sponsor list for other unsundry activities, and I regularly decline submits promoting those sponsors.

As I noted in a reply to this same topic on another board, I don't go on the war path often, but when I do I neither fight fair nor take any prisoners.

SykkBoy 2008-07-28 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie (Post 411846)
I tell people how to conduct their business all the time & everyone loves me! |couch|

Banning a sponsor is BIG, regardless of how big your site is. I've only done it twice: Epic Cash & Ultra Cash - and I think everyone can agree that I had VERY valid reasons for each.

I completely understand what Toby's doing. I sometimes wish there was an option to turn it off & take a lower payout like programs do with consoles.

But, this is a BIG part of the PPS business model & I'm a PPS kinda guy |thumb

That's because we dig the fact you have had the same haircut since 1989 ;-)

I understand what he's doing as well and truly do wish him well...I don't begrudge anyone conducting business the way they want. I also admire the fact he's arguing his point without resorting to name calling or anything like that. We could use more of that in this industry.

Toby 2008-07-28 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie (Post 411848)
Toby - before I forget, great topic & I love the anger.

It's also perfect timing for a long board discussion seeing as it's Monday. If this thread started on a Friday, no one would remember it Monday morning :)

But it's really fucking up my productivity. |banghead|

bluemoney 2008-07-28 08:20 PM

I just showed a join page to my 22 year old son. I asked him if he were buying how he would go about it.

He looked at the sign up page that had one pre-checked box and one unchecked box.

He looked the page over for a minute.

“I thought you wouldn’t have to buy porn”? he said |loony|

“Would you please throw me a bone here and pretend your buying it” I said

He grabbed the mouse and unchecked the pre-checked box and checked the one that had been unchecked (it was less expensive)

“I would probably get this one but not both”

I asked him if he thought the pre-checked box was deceptive

“No I can see it right there . . . but if it were unchecked I probably wouldn’t have noticed either of them”

Let me add he was not coached and the boxes were in full view without scrolling at all.

My take! There is a line between “suggestive selling” and “sneaky selling”

Toby 2008-07-28 09:18 PM

From a similar discussion on another board. Reposted with the authors permission.
Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX
Let my try painting a picture here and you tell me whether it's white, black or grey.

We're at a point where pretty much every sponsor with an own merchant account and the bulk of sponsors with enough volume to be allowed to are doing pre-checked cross-sales. While pre-checked cross-sales per se may not be bad, what these people are doing is shady, at best. Oftentimes the price of the cross-sales is hidden in fine print, the boxes are tucked away far below the submit button, the wording is made up so it doesn't clearly imply that you'll get charged for the memberships, etc, etc. Shortly put, pushing the legality of the practice to its limits.

Now, how does this affect the industry? Well, for one, these sites do cross-sales between them on pretty much the same pool of surfers. Much like we trade TGP traffic, passing the same surfers from one site to another. The end result? The surfer gets slapped with anything from $100 to $200 (depending on the sites he joins and his location) in charges for the cross-sales and never trusts a paysite with his creditcard again. In many cases the cross-sales are even for sites they'd actually get access to anyway, by joining the site they want in the first place. And as if that was not enough, if they want to cancel, they often get even more cross-sales thrown at then hidden below the submit button on the cancellation page. So they think they cancelled one or two memberships but end up having signed up for different ones instead. Their credit cards get practically raped.

Now, you'd think bleeding the market dry for potential customers would be bad enough, but as it turns out, that's not the biggest problem. See, being that these people are pushing things to such an extreme degree, can you imagine what would happen if the mainstream media got a whiff of this? Just imagine one single loon with an agenda (remember minusonebit anyone?) starting doing research, putting together names of individuals and companies and sending it to mainstream media channels, while dragging in VISA and MasterCard along with it, as supporters. All it takes is one fairly reputable mainstream media source to run a comprehensive story on this and many others would follow suit. Let's face it, in a time when the consumer is struggling to make ends meet, the economy is darker than it's been in many decades and people are losing their jobs and homes, this would make for an incredibly great story and unbelievably suitable scapegoat for many.

Does anyone remember the big stink caused by dialers 6-7 years ago? That is a piss in the ocean compared to what would happen if the above scenario were to take place. What could happen? Worst-case scenario, the end of this industry as we know it. Processors would go out of business, many sponsors (good and bad) would go out of business and with them the majority of affiliates.

Now going back to the sponsors-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot part, they don't give a fuck. They're leveraging their size to squeeze the industry out of one last fast buck, because the ones doing this could easily retire yesterday since they've already got it made. In fact, it is my belief (and to a certain degree actual knowldge) that it's exactly what some of them are doing, squeezing the last drop of blood from the industry, while they already have mainstream projects lined up, getting ready to move on to greener pastures.

Now, the only reason why no one has tipped off the mainstream media about this yet is because those to whom the idea occured also realized that they'd go down with the ship as well. However, the risk of this happening is getting bigger and bigger and all of you who promote these sponsors are, in fact, also risking your short-term paychecks, not only your long-term ones. Because if the shit hits the fan, the FTC gets involved and VISA and MC pull out, fucked doesn't even begin to describe what you will be.

So tell me, is it white, black or grey?


ArtWilliams 2008-07-28 09:58 PM

Epic Cash. Shit, I can type Epic Cash. Wasn't there a time when I couldn't type Epic Cash? I would just get **** **** or ********? Okay, I know I am bringing nothing to the thread here but I just wanted to say it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie (Post 411846)
I tell people how to conduct their business all the time & everyone loves me! |couch|

Banning a sponsor is BIG, regardless of how big your site is. I've only done it twice: Epic Cash & Ultra Cash - and I think everyone can agree that I had VERY valid reasons for each.

I completely understand what Toby's doing. I sometimes wish there was an option to turn it off & take a lower payout like programs do with consoles.

But, this is a BIG part of the PPS business model & I'm a PPS kinda guy |thumb


plateman 2008-07-28 10:28 PM

I believe that the people who dont see them when joining and find out later will become a non joiner later

I've looked at some and most are visible...

IMO if your worried about it, educate your surfers about it on your site on some pages of it, take care of your surfers and hopefully they will take care of you by keep joining your pay links

cross sales are a way of life for the PPS programs, if they hide them then it is not acceptable...

IMO it's far worse to have link trades with other sites that have those free join email sites that have aggressive popups on there tours

justbondage 2008-07-29 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toby (Post 411881)
From a similar discussion on another board. Reposted with the authors permission.

Visa and Mastercard are making too much money to pull out, and even if they did find out (I am almost 100% certain they already know) unless it is illegal activity, they have far bigger things to be worrying about.

nekrom 2008-07-29 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justbondage (Post 411910)
Visa and Mastercard are making too much money to pull out, and even if they did find out (I am almost 100% certain they already know) unless it is illegal activity, they have far bigger things to be worrying about.

The online income that is generated in adult with visa/mc is but a drop in the bucket compared to mainstream non-adult.

-N

tigermom 2008-07-29 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nekrom (Post 411913)
The online income that is generated in adult with visa/mc is but a drop in the bucket compared to mainstream non-adult.

-N

Interesting. Can you please point us to some data about this? I'm not sure at all that this is the case.

I agree that pre-checked boxes under the fold is shady at best. I would think that anyone who gets screwed by those has the sense to contact their CC company and get their money back. Next you would have a lot of charge backs and then the companies would stop - right? I wonder why this isn't happening - maybe not enough people fall for this trick?

papagmp 2008-07-29 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tigermom (Post 411936)
Interesting. Can you please point us to some data about this? I'm not sure at all that this is the case.

I agree that pre-checked boxes under the fold is shady at best. I would think that anyone who gets screwed by those has the sense to contact their CC company and get their money back. Next you would have a lot of charge backs and then the companies would stop - right? I wonder why this isn't happening - maybe not enough people fall for this trick?

I have to agree with tigermom, it's devious but if the CC companies were really getting enough complaints (chargebacks) then they would jump in and monitor the vendors. They do this in mainstream so it would be foolish to assume that they don't do it in adult.

I process just under $1,000,000 in credit cards annually in my mainstream businesses, and chargebacks are rare, but the merchant account companies hate them - they cost way more in time and effort than the CC companies will ever recover so if there truly were too many, we'd see a change in the rules.

justbondage 2008-07-29 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nekrom (Post 411913)
The online income that is generated in adult with visa/mc is but a drop in the bucket compared to mainstream non-adult.

-N

Possibly, but it is still a lot of money.

Useless 2008-07-29 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justbondage (Post 411910)
Visa and Mastercard are making too much money to pull out, and even if they did find out (I am almost 100% certain they already know) unless it is illegal activity, they have far bigger things to be worrying about.

Visa proved a long time ago what it thinks about the adult industry and its willingness to say, "fuck you and your money and the headaches you've created." We'd be fucked without Visa - Visa would be fine without us.

justbondage 2008-07-29 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior (Post 411961)
Visa proved a long time ago what it thinks about the adult industry and its willingness to say, "fuck you and your money and the headaches you've created." We'd be fucked without Visa - Visa would be fine without us.

Why, what did they do?

Mr. Blue 2008-07-29 10:37 AM

Funny when Toby posted this on another forum I asked if he got the Link List guys opinion on it. I figured you guys would have a lot more piss and vinegar then TGP guys and sure enough...lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluemoney (Post 411873)
My take! There is a line between “suggestive selling” and “sneaky selling”

blueeee, lol, it's not exactly an ideal scientific experiment you set up there. What I mean to say is if my father brought me to a porn page and asked me to signup I'd start questioning what the hell he was up to and I'd be expecting a |club| behind the head. So I'm pretty sure he was more observant then he'd be in a real situation:

Real situation, hand on dick, trying to join quickly while typing with one hand. There's a good chance you might not notice pre-checked cross sales below the submit button, especially if he's a cheapskate and buying a trial. If someone is buying a trial, it essentially means they want something on the cheap, not an extra $80 in passes. That guy will never buy another membership after that experience.

With all that said though, I do support Toby, but at the same time realize the inevitability of the situation. Sponsors do this because they’re catering to what some affiliates want and they have to keep up with the Joneses. I personally think pre-checked cross sales below the submit is shady as shit, it hurts the business, but it just gets added onto the very long list of things that hurt the industry. I mean when you see a site like XNXX, a once fine traffic source, turning into a tube site giving away 30 minute videos…umm…yeah, you can see as an industry we don’t always do what’s best in preserving what we have.

Mr. Blue 2008-07-29 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie (Post 411715)
As far as the surfer joining a site, if they are dumb enough to put their CC info in there without reading the entire page - and there's not a lot of text on the example Toby posted - who's fault is that?

Everyone that reviews complains that the submitters need to learn how to read, yet those same people often support surfers that need to learn how to read.

Do the Russians still hate you? lol. What I mean to say whether you're right or wrong about it's the responsibility of the individual, it's how the individual perceives the situation that matters most.

So when you ban someone from your Link List do they go, "Gee, GreenGuy was completely right, it's all my fault and I'll suffer the consequences of not reading" or will they go, "GreenGuy is a dick"

9 out of 10 banned people would probably go with the Dick line, even if you were completely right. When I reject galleries or ban people, the submitter that screwed up thinks I'm 100% wrong. Whatever, in that situation you can give them the one finger salute because there's 500 more people waiting to replace that one.

However, it's not applicable when it comes to potential customers. Whether it's their responsibility or not, how are they going to feel when they get an $80 bill for a trial membership that they thought they were buying. You can say what's right and wrong till the cows come home, that surfer / customer, is going to think he's right and got ripped off. Unfortunately paying porn customers in this age of free porn on the net, is not so easily replaced.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc