|acid

|raygun|

Here's a question for everyone reading to ponder, not just Cleo.

If after someone admits he was wrong, apologizes and rectifies what he did -- and people still call him a "piece of shit" and ban him -- what is the incentive to do the right thing? The only incentive would be to follow his own conscience, which is ultimately what I did here. I have no regrets. But being this harsh to someone who is willing to own up to what he did is ultimately probably a poor life strategy.

By unbanned I meant that Cleo apparently no longer has a rule that she will not list sites that have my recip on them.

As to the "multiple nick submitter" thing, I have only ever used two nicknames for submitting, each of them associated with a different domain. I have not used them at the same time; I used one first then I stopped using it and adopted another. If there is some rule you are stuck with a nick for life I'd have been more careful to adopt one I really liked.

Have you ever heard less is more |goodnight

Yes but traditionally that philosophy is not followed on adult webmaster message boards.

It's been nearly 5 months since this first kicked off.... so why didn't you just replace the code back then?

You didn't offer to rectify the problem, you just offered to "work things out"... what was there to work out?

Why didn't you just remove the offending code and then try and build bridges?

I should have. Ultimately I realized that and that's what I'm trying to do.

Come on noone is ever gonna trust you :( You admitted to using two user names to submit and for a reviewer or a Link list owner that sends up a flag and then add that to the fact that you copied Cleos stuff then leave it up now ya want to make nice but it fact all you are doing is digging a deeper hole for yourself its all about trust here and man you sure are not getting any at this point for sure :(