jaden someone keeps telling programs that having your url on pictures is the best way to get traffic. They package them up on newsgroups bit torrent, and any other way they can to try to drive traffic. it probably works to an extent, but now means that single girl model sites burn out mostly within a month or two from sheer over exposure. In the end, it hurts their business but most people look short term gains and dont care about long term pain.

Alex

Once again Alex this is yet another example of your misinformation, lack of knowledge, and ignorance about Usenet and our service.

I'd strongly encourage you to support your future statements about our service with factual information.

Once again... we do NOT filter, aggregate, extract or archive Usenet content.

While there are companies that extract, edit and archive Usenet content... I believe GUBA is one of them... that has nothing to do with our service.

We are a Usenet service, and we provide realtime access to unedited Usenet newsgroup content, through a web-based newsreader that we developed.

We have been providing this service for the past 12 years... along with other companies like Comcast, Adelphia, RoadRunner, etc... and there is nothing illegal about it.

Accessing the newsgroups through our web-based newsreader is no different than accessing the Usenet newsgroups with any other newsreader like Microsoft Outlook, Forte Agent, etc.

The benefit to using our newsreader is that end-users don't have to install any software (they use their web browser), and it's more intuitive for most folks because it is web-based.

Like any other newsreader... and any other Usenet service... end-users have the capacity to sort or organize content within a newsgroup realtime. They can sort content by date, author, subject line, content type, etc.

The URL that you referenced, simply highlights one of those sort options within the newsreader (thumbnail sort).

Regardless of the sort option that an end user selects... date, author, thumbnail, etc... they are sorting that newsgroup content realtime. The entire post is there, nothing has been edited or filtered.

To give you a general feel for the newsreader, you can view the screen captures at this URL...

http://eroticusenet.com/screens.htm

Like any other newsreader, an end user would view a list of the Usenet newsgroups. They'd select a newsgroup of interest, and view the content within that group realtime.

The end user has a number of options for sorting that content realtime. As an example there's a "Discussion Thread" and "Thumbnail" sort option, which are noted in the screen captures.

At this point, we've said all we can say on this topic, so this will most likely be our last post to this thread.

We've appreciated the opportunity to talk about our service, and if there are remaining questions please feel free to contact us by email or phone. Thanks!

As noted several times in this thread, we are a Usenet service provider.

We do not extract, edit or archive newsgroup content. We are not Fusker, we are not GUBA, we have nothing in common with any of those services.

We offer realtime access to Usenet newsgroups through a web-based newsreader that we developed. It's no different than the Microsoft Outlook newsreader, except that our interface is web-based and does not require end users to download/install 3rd party applications. They use their web browser.

We've been providing this service to retail and commercial clients for the past 12 years. It is the same type of service that Comcast, Adelphia, RoadRunner, Earthlink, etc. provides to their retail and commercial customers.

ISPs, telcos, web portals, universities, government agencies, national newspapers, law firms, corporations, etc. come to us when they want to provide Usenet newsgroup access to their end users, but they don't want to operate the servers, storage & bandwidth required to sustain a Usenet service that conveys 800 GB of newsgroup content daily.

They can outsource that headache, overhead, and cost to us for as little as $75/month... and make the newsgroups accessible to their end users through a web-based newsreader that they can brand to match the appearance of their site.

That's just a few of the ways that our service helps webmasters, designers and developers.

Like any other product/service it may not be a good fit for everyone, but if you had any questions please feel free to phone or email our staff. We're available 7 days a week.

Can I please see an example that is not screen caps? PM me the info you don't want to post it in public.

We'll do you one better... if you operate a legitimate adult entertainment website, we'll let you run our EroticUsenet service at your site for 1 month... free of charge!

No credit cards, no checks, no invoicing. If the service doesn't meet your needs for whatever reason, you can simply let it expire at the end of the month without any cost or obligation.

With the exception of Alec... who has already arrived at false conclusions about our product without ever trying it... this would give folks a legitimate opportunity to check out our service first hand, and arrive at their own conclusions.

If you'd like to take advantage of this, please email (info@eroticusenet.com) or phone us (408-720-7620) and we'll get you setup.

Can we throw it on here?

eroticusenet, you don't understand... I have already seen your service. I need not say more.

Oh yeah, Alex, not Alec... that is for Sir Alec Guiness, not me.

Alec :)
Is it really just the filtering that bothers you? When looking at images on usenet, I really only see spam for the text included. Do you really ever see more than that?

Jim, the filtering bothers me because if I took images from usenet and just put them on my site, I would get my ass banned all over the place and have content providers send C&Ds all over. Filtering, the showing of images without the context is a real problem. NO 2257, no license, no contract... usenet wide open with the end user doing the filtering is UP TO THE USER. When the usenet provider has built in filtering, thumbnailers, and generally allows people to quickly enjoy content without context, well, they pass the line.

Just one of those things.

Alex

Alex - since you've seen it, maybe you can answer mine & Jim's question - Are the image still on the Usenet server or are they extracted from it, sorted & then uploaded to a regular http server/location?

I agree with this but, as Greenie asks in his own little way :) Is he just making it easier to access the images or is he downloading them?

Usenet content is being displayed on an Internet web page.
I don't see any practical way for that to be done without downloading the messages from Usenet and saving them to a database for access by a web server. I'm sure I'll be corrected if wrong, but I seriously doubt that the images are converted from UUE, BASE64, etc., then thumbnailed, and displayed in real time for every browser request. That would be a huge processing load on the server.

Toby, you hit the nail on the head - processing overhead to re-thumbnail a newsgroup every time would be insane, not likely. No, the images are pulled out, thumbnailed in bulk, and so on. If it is the same version of the software that I saw, you use the thumbnails to download the images only in bulk - no messages, no headers, no nothing - just bulk download. That software runs SERVER SIDE not USER SIDE. User only downloads and enjoy images, movies, and such and is not subjected to the actual newsgroup messages.

"A full featured server-side newsreader, that offers instant web-based access to newsgroups. DRN simplifies the news reading process by automatically decoding, downloading & displaying multimedia content for users."

Once you start editing, filtering, or simplifying the extraction of only images you have pretty much jumped the line.

Alex

Jim, putting it in simpler terms, it is a fusker of newsgroups.

Alex

eroticusenet - can you tell me the URL of a site that's using this & then I'll just join the fucker & see it for myself.

I sense a tapdance coming on.... :)

Alex

I just want to see it. I don't want to set it up on a site. I don't want a song and dance...let's see how it works.

https://acc.newsguy.com/cgi-bin/sub_trial_form

There's a trial of the "software".
It didn't accept my CC, hope someone else has better luck.

Alex - you have not posted a truthful comment about our service within this entire discussion thread.

Two quick points...

1. You said that you've already seen our service - can you please provide the URL for the website where you viewed and accessed our service?

2. If you used our service Alex, then you know that we provide realtime access to Usenet newsgroups... and all of your statements about what we do and don't do have been incorrect. Why would you knowingly go out of your way to misrepresent our service, and lie about its features & functionality?

As I've mentioned several times in this discussion thread, we provide realtime access to Usenet newsgroups, so your comment about saving content to a database is incorrect.

Usenet services do require a lot of servers, bandwidth, processing capacity, etc., so it's not a casual undertaking. You're correct on that point.

We've been providing Usenet services to retail and commercial customers for the past 12 years, so we've had the benefit of being able to gradually grow our infrastructure (hardware, bandwidth, etc.) along with our customer base.

That's one of the nice advantages of our service... a webmaster could add newsgroup access to their website, without having to locally operate a hardware/software infrastructure that's taken us 12 years to establish.

What the Fuck are you hiding? Why do you continuously overlook us asking to see the service before we make up our minds?

I gave you the benefit of the doubt but the more you evade the question of seeing the service, the more I think you are a thief.

Then you're telling us that you actually do convert Usenet encoded images (UUE, BASE64, etc.) to JPG format and thumbnail them on the fly every single time a user requests a thumbnail sorted page? Just a simple yes or no answer please, I grow weary of the song & dance and sales pitch.

|band |bananna| |pink |bananna| |pink

Toby, you aren't the only one sick of the song and dance.

But WHY would a webmaster WANT to add newsgroup access to their site? Should we be convincing our surfers to go elsewhere to troll for free images rather than selling them on paysites?

This discussion started when XBiz took our advertising dollars, and then decided to make disparaging comments about our service. They had a chance to review our website, service and banners in advance, so if there was a legitimate problem, a professional organization would have rejected our advertising before it went live.

Secondly, after reading incorrect opinions that had been posted to the Greenguy board, we made a genuine attempt to help educate folks about Usenet and our service.

We did this by offering webmasters an opportunity to try the service live at their website... free of charge... for an entire month. They could have tested the service personally, or they could have made it available to their site users... whichever was most convenient for them.

That process would have allowed us to get to know one another from a business to business standpoint, and more importantly, it would have given us a chance to address specific questions and concerns on an individual basis.

Unfortunately, rather than take advantage of that generous offer, people ignored it... determined that it wasn't worth their time... or they visited an unrelated retail Usenet site to setup a trial account with a bad credit card.

Rather than take 15 minutes to actually try a service, it's seems that folks are more content with sitting back and arriving at uninformed conclusions instead. It's an unfortunate situation, but it's obvious that we're not going to get a fair shake.

You've been given ample opportunity to give straight answers to simple questions. Instead you point fingers at those asking the questions, give vague and evasive answers, and spew forth more ad copy. You've been your own worst enemy here. A few yes or no answers would have settled the issue on page one instead of dragging on for three or four. But I don't think you really wanted to give truthful answers to those questions.

The ball is in your court, put up or shut up!

Jesus Christ, are you both blind and stupid or just stupid? How many times do we have to ask to see it to make informed comments. It is you that is hiding from it.

I was the only person that didn't jump to conclusions and now I have no choice.

WWASD

What Would Al Swearingen Do?

So you're saying that NewsGuy isn't related to Erotic Usenet?

Odd. They have the same phone number as you posted earlier in this thread. The mainstream ad copy is a copy of the Erotic Usenet frontend. There are couple of other frontends too with the exact same design and ad copy.

HOLY FUCKING CHRIST! Tell me where I can try the fucking thing out for myself & I'll go fucking try it!!!!!!

How fucking dense are you? |banghead|

I really can't remember being so frustrated :)
We almost beg to see the service then he claims we need to see the service to form an opinion.

I suspect he is hiding the truth. Xbiz probably made the right decision to stop dealing with him.

eroticusenet:

I get the feeling you guys are a mainstream company making their first foray into the adult webmaster B2B market and you either haven't done your market research / consultancy at all, or you've been advised by someone who knows sweet FA about the market.

I get this feeling because:

- your parent company PathLink was an ISP between 1997 at least and June 04, and that domain was reg'd in '95;

- you're failing to understand the idea that adult webmasters generally will give even big established companies a hard time;

- you're failing miserably at giving adult webmasters clear and concise info about your product backed up with salient facts.

Now having said that, here's some free consultancy for you:

- Adult webmasters can generally be described as independent, feisty, cantankerous, cynical. They've had more people try to sell them fool's gold than you've had hot dinners.

- As a rule adult webmasters are as easy to herd as cats. Mainstream webmasters seem much more supine.

- If you'd had proper advice you'd know who Greenguy is (http://www.link-o-rama.com/) and who Jim is (chat to the guys at CECash and FlashCash). I've only been doing this since Jan 97, so I'm a newbie. I think you could trust them with working demo access.

- Selling content in today's market is unbelievably tough. Selling feeds / plugins is even tougher. I've sold both.

- In order to sell feeds webmaster access to a working demo is sine qua non. I couldn't spot one on your site.

- In today's content market 2257 is a very big issue, especially with proposed amendments to 2257 last summer / fall - although they haven't been effected yet. I couldn't see any 2257 info on your site. If you think it isn't relevant to your service, think again. It's very relevant to your market.

- You've probably only got one more chance to convince the crowd before the thumb goes down and the lions are released. Use it wisely.

- You really should have hired a decent consultant.

Good luck.

Very well put Jeremy, nice post.

I was thinking the same thing about a consultant, Jeremy
But now, a new front man might be in order

Eroticusenet, I am like Jeremy, just a newbie from 96 or 97... I haven't been at this very long. Your service (as a standard newsgroup thing) has been around for quite a while. The thumbnailer program used inside your site (and actively promoted in your sales pitch) has been around for a while, more typically on an end user basis rather than on a server basis. Without even accessing your site, I am able to show where you aggregate, filter, and extract images for end users to download. It's right there in your ad copy, the image is right there, try to deny what is directly on your own site. You don't make people download all the newsgroup to find images (standard newsgroup operation) but instead you filter out all the messages, all the headers, all the thread info, and allow the users to click thumbnails and generate a downloadable file (likely zipped to save bandwidth) of all the images, movies, and such that they select. They receive this data MINUS the actual posting that went with it.

As someone else asked: Is this true yes or no? No ad copy, no long speeches, can people click on thumbnails generated by your system and download images only without messages directly from your service? YES OR NO?

If you answer yes, do you have license and 2257 documentation for those images?

If the answer is NO, then please consult a lawyer. If the answer is yes, then I doubt you understand the question or have chosen not to answer truthfully.

Please answer the simple questions. No speeches, no ad copy, no on and on. It's about your service. Answer the questions.

Alex

This thread is useless without demos.

This thread is useless without answers.

Alex

This thread is useless.

Gee, thanks! :)