You all can promote anything you like but I'm not listing anything that in anyway implies anything that has under 18 in its name.

Club17 is banned at my LL as well.

Sky isn't falling Chop, my man. I was just hoping that this thread was taking a bad turn due to the language barrier/cultural perceptions and thought that perhaps a calming post would reel it all in. This is one of those subjects that Europeans and Americans just don't agree on. Europeans, as with much of the free world, have much more liberal feelings about this topic than we Americans. Who's right, who's wrong? Doesn't matter. I sure we can all come to a concrete agreement on this as soon as the goverment gives a clear and well written defintion of obscenity.

UW thats exactly what I mean, many things is the way you interpret it, club seventeen is just one of them, I have promoted another sites called schoolgirls first time, which you can interpret that the wrong way as well, its like I said about teeniesex, its the same thing. I didn't say that GG was looking at CP because it stated that all models was 18+ so honestly I didn't think thats what I was doing, like I said I have apologised and sincerely hope he will accept my apology. I have no enemies and didn't want to make any here. GG I agree its your site and you say what gets listed, it shouldn't be any other way, I think I was gobsmacked that I came here for some assistance and got told that the site I was promoting was CP wouldn't you put a ? to that, I don't want to have anything to do with CP either, I am a family man with children, I two hate it.

Personally I think that although these sites that go by names of schoolgirls and ************* although have models over the age of 18 definately attract the wrong crowd.

As long as the models are treated well and are happy its not too much of a problem - but think about who you are marketing it too with a title like club17 - guys who want girls below the consenting age. If thats what you want to promote then thats your choice but dont expect everyone to like it.

These sort of sites could definatly be seen in a negative light by many people (such as GG) and so having links to or listing content of this nature on your site reflects the sites personal morals and what type of surfers they are targeting.

I personally would not list them (if i had a LL) because it definately sends out the wrong image and I dont agree with it. I would probably Blacklist the person from submitting again.

I certainly agree neveremail, if I was GG and had his point of view then I would blacklist people, only thing is don't you think it would be right to put it on his submission page ?

Rule number 26. - If we plain dont like the site it wont get listed.

The rule list is long enough for ppl to read it doesn't need to cover abosultely every little detail otherwise no-one would read it.

If you want to promote those sorts of sites and GG doesn't live with it and find some LLs that will list it.

Or promote sponsers with a better name.

*LOL* I am living with it don't worry Link-O-Rama is just one of many link lists and the others seem to be ok with it ...

Never known Greenguy to base his operations on what others do