Yep I was asked for my password but then I got told again its not on file. |cry|

On a different subject, following on from what Ponygirl said, I'd like to see a Lingerie cat as well. The site I'm trying to add is lingerie based and I'll put it under Fetish. |thumb
Cheers

Figured it out. You're not a preferred submitter yet. ;) PM me with your username, password, and submission email. I have your samples, but I didn't receive an email with that info. I'll get you set up tonight.

Hey UW,

I just sent you a PM.

Thanks UW
You have a PM |thumb

I always thought it was pronounced "jah-vez" :D

It looks like a Spanish word. In Spain they pronounce the J by clearing the throat, as if preparing to spit copiously. :D

Now he tells us! I've been pronouncing it "cock-sucker". :D

Although I don't create Free sites to submit (hence me being a link directory)...I had to stop by here and say awesome colour scheme and logo! Very well done peeps |bow|

I sent you a few For Women sites to get that cat goin :D

If you guys do decide to add a pantyhose or lingerie category I submit at least one a week sometimes two pantyhose sites and I got a few sites I have already made and can add your recip so you could fill up the category.

Because I would like to see this category as well

Which do you prefer? Pantyhose or lingerie? Seems that Pantyhose would get more submissions than lingerie. Opinions?

Maybe a "sexy clothing" category that would cover pantyhose, lingerie, panties, etc?

Hmmm...that may be the winner. A good cover-all so that we don't have a bunch of similar categories, each with one submission per week.

hey...."Sexy Clothing" sounds good...it would cover many aspects of clothing ...good job there GG!

Lingerie would include both pantyhose & stockings if they did not have categories of their own. Surfers are used to finding those type of galleries there, and lingerie sites often have those as sub categories.

"Sexy Clothing" is a webmaster catch all, not a category a surfer is going to be looking for, nor know that it includes lingerie, stockings, pantyhose etc. I won't even go into trying to teach submitters what to put in there.

Damn you all |angry|

How about a 'Not Exactly Naked' category?

Since when are pantyhose conisdered lingerie? Your wives must have nicer pantyhose than mine. ;)

Pantyhose and stockings have been lingerie longer than I've been around admiring the shapely legs that wear them.

Womens hosiery is usually a section within the lingerie department in most retail stores.

hehe looks like something got started here

well, I vote for lingerie, as I do pantyhose, stockings & panties - all of which ideally would have their own cat but I know that's not really feasible most of the time...but PLEASE don't just put a pantyhose cat, I need somewhere to put my panties - insert lewd pervert comments here ;) -
(I also think that stockings are way different than pantyhose too but that's just my opinion :D )

Ponygirl

Stockings are for babes who are already sexy. Pantyhose are to help mold and cover flesh for babes who need the extra help.

What about a movie category?

you're added :D

I agree that stockings and pantyhose are completely different, but very few LL's make a distinction.
If you're going to make one 'non nude' cat, you're better off calling it Lingerie to begin with as a catch-all. You can then split it later when you see what type of subs you get. |waves|

Lingerie category added.

Eat me.

Ewwwwww :D

LOL I agree |scared|

but thanks UW, for the addition! |blowkiss|

Ponygirl

what about bisexual....

The beast has been released... :)

Thanks for Lingerie UW.
:)

Well, I figured it wouldn't fit me anymore anyway, so why not give it away. Let's not even mention those unsightly cum stains. |waves|

:D

Ponygirl

2 Cents:

Pantyhose/Stockings

Lingerie/Panties

This is based partially on how often my submitters *almost* get the recip right :D

Lingerie is a low submit category, so you're definitely better off combining it with something else.

Pantyhose, on the other hand, is almost synonymous with stockings, and I'll be damned if the recip is right on 30% of the sumbits I get to those cats. Probably more due to localized terminology, because in some places they do mean the same thing.

Don't forget "cheerleaders"

I absolutely refuse to add any more categories :D I don't want to lead Javes down the path that I lead Filthy Earl. He started with a shit load of categories and has never had the submissions to support those pages. Poor Earl

Once the current pages fill up, I'll be more than willing to break them down to sensible sub-cats and niches, but it's just not feasible at this very moment. In fact, there may be a couple of near-empty categories that disappear very soon. Bottom line - empty pages don't serve the surfer nor the submitter. Google indexes content, not great voids. Trade partners are only going to trade with pages that have content. I wouldn't be doing anyone any favors by setting up categories that Javes simply cannot support this early in the game.

Submit damn you! |viking|

Good job Useless
JAVES does seem to be doing very well. We are getting the submissions we wanted. You will notice though...a cool little script. When you go to submit a site, there is a table titled "What we need". These are cats that need to be filled up. The category of sites we need the most is on top. You will always know what we need the most...all automatic.

I have a question, being that I have not been in the Free site building arena in a LONG time. I submitted a few sites that were rejected for having more than 3 links out (not in the rules which I did read, honest!) So, I corrected the problem and went to re-submit the sites, but it won't let me, says the URL already exists. So my question is, if a site is rejected is there no way to resubmit it?

Sorry if I sound like a newbie...LOL But as I said, I have not built free sites in a long time.

:)

And this is where hand I the question over to Sparky. :D

And yes, Bestat, I'm aware of this problem. I believe it's part of the script's security features. I'd certainly prefer that declined submitters be able to re-submit, otherwise - what's the point of telling them why they were declined? Right?

dupe submission issue fixed. typo in the detection of an existing url.

Either that or UW was banning all submissions when declining them. I blame Useless Warrior. :)

I blame Gabbo. |gabbo|

LOL, thanks for looking into this gentlemen. I will try to make sure that the sites don't get banned in the first place.

Damn gabbo! :)

What about movies?