Bingo. We have a winner!


Yes sir. I'll get right on that. :D

Soft content doesn't work for me :(

I wrote one a while back, pick from templates and images it would make the pages add recipts for posting to tgps and even had a tgp post assistant script to help submit the galleries. Or you could just download it and do what you wanted with it. I didnt like it so we dont even offer it to webmasters to use.

SexyCityBrian

I'm lost too, but let me take a stab at it :D

Yes, and we (and most other forums) tweak & customize things. Not quite sure how that fits into this thread, which is about TGP Gallery generating scripts & their usefulness.

That was Jim's comments (as pointed out already) but I will say that I agree 100% with him. You're an idiot if you send newsletters that surfers would be interested in to webmasters & vice versa. If a webmaster wanted surfer themed newsletters, I think they'd probably sign up for them. We ruin a webmaster board & thus, our newsletters cover areas of interest to our webmasters as it pertains to the board & the business.

Again, I agree with you, but that has nothing to do with the topic of this thread (which I don't think was even in the newsletter today)

If you take the word "our" out of there & correct the title of my site, that questions almost makes sense :D

I'll assume that's what you meant & say that the design of my personal site that is for surfers to surfer & webmasters to submit to has pretty much been the same since I went to categorized links back in 97 )with the exception of 1 overhaul of the main page) so yes, I think it is effective for surfers to surf & webmasters to submit to, since it's still my main source of income :)

skipping
 

Hi GreenGuy.

Thanks for the reply, detailed - appreciate it.

And I like your photo as well, you remind me of this guitarist from this band Aiwass that used be around NYC... you look just like him.

I knew you weren't a one eyed monster! |headbang|

I agree with this approach - and making the text hardcore and accurate for what is to follow.

I am cool with a limited supply of hard - but I don't like the idea of giving away the money shots - wdyt?

Pretty much, Greenguy. :) The only thing would be is that it makes it easier for people starting out. Those who do not have templates, recip blocks, a database of where to submit, etc.

Also I could forsee something nifty whereby it could take your preferences and when new free content is available, just go ahead and generate the gallery for you.

Er, okay, that would be a little ridiculous! Nevermind. |badidea|

I will say this. That you come here, ask us, and actually listen to what we say and consider it goes in your favor. I can really appreciate that concept as I'm sure others can as well.

Thanks! That is a huge compliment. This board really gives great, as in professional and informative, feedback and I would be a complete fool not to heed the advice of both the old-timers and the noobs here.

No need for all hardcore. Take a facial set for example 2-3 of the girl getting naked 2-3 of the guy fondling her 5 of her sucking him 5 of her getting her face slightly splattered and looking like she needs more. :D

Yeah, some hardcore should be in the set. It is awful difficult to connect the dots for the surfer of her full clothed, and she is supposed to be doing a double anal.

A lot of sponsors chopped their content back to the first bit only, and that seems to be what is in most. And I'm still under the impression that if you use a picture from a set, you have to do the 2257 for the full set(s).

Funny, some people are trying to tell a major sponsor that right now.

Do you want to see the stats from the sponsors own traffic or see what the top affiliates are doing? Or both? And should what stats in particular? Only fhg traffic or any type of traffic? And which stats particularly?

I like the idea of surfers rating the content though so webmasters can see what performs well.

We were thinking of posting the top ten performers but keeping the account names confidential would seem less believable and posting the names might piss off webmasters. What do you all think?

As an affiliate, I'd be pissed if any actual numbers or dollar amounts were posted, but I'd be fine with you letting other affiliates know what my conversion ratios are (since I do that anyway - lol)

I can say tha Far-L is bending over backwards to have a good affiliate program. IMO, posting dollar amounts would be like my bank telling the public how far in overdraft I am.

I agree. But that were the good old times, I´m afraid. I often get galleries rejected when it - the moneyshot - is missing. So it´s a difficulty to keep the moneyshots secret.

If all of us would be less generous with giving out that content, signups would rise, I think. After all, we sell porn not give it away.|thumb

That´s right. earned amounts and traffic stats are not public matter. If you want me to know it, you´ll tell me. But conversion ratios are interesting, at least if they aren´t second or whatnot page clicks. To compare it´s most important for me to get information about how many clicks I sent to a program and where I sent it from.

So most sponsor stats suck in my opinion, because it´s a problem to get a comparable base to other sponsors.

Good point - won't be posting that info!

If it's for a cumshot specific site/page/category then yes, but WTF? Some reviewers need to lighten up a bit :D

Hehe, cumshots for a cumshot gallery are pretty OK, aren´t they? But some reviewers shouldn´t be reviewers. I ignore silly rejections as long as the ratio of listed galleries is OK. Sometimes I have to complain, especially if a reviewer obviously didn´t review anything|bananna|

Ain't using them
Either i make some or use their FHG's
That's when i'm playing around with the tgp traffic thingo

I agree - for example, comparing review sites with tgps is definitely apples and oranges - the conversion ratios only hint at what is going on... but maybe there is another way to go about it.

I like the idea of having monthly prizes to top converting, top earning, most traffic, etc. but to me a contest is only good if it is very clear that it is fair and auditable. I have seen so many years of rigged contests in this biz and i am sure many others hold the same skepticism. In everything we do, our actions need to be fully accountable and our methods open to review.

Contests are a nice idea. But first of all I prefer sponsors with clear stats (earned and already paid amount), mebers area access for building galleries and freesites and quick support. I hate it if there are no or bullshit replies from sponsor reps. Of course I don´t want to discuss the weather forecast with the support, but real problems should get an answer.

So far we are getting good feedback on the stats but there is always room for improvement... We will be adding a bunch of content this week though. We don't have 24/7 support but we do have good people and have not had any complaints on that level so far. We have always been very proactive about customer experience - be it end users or webmasters - so that is one area where I am confident we are on point.

I´m sorry if I offended your support, didn´t want to do that. I was only speaking generally about my experience with some major affiliate programs. 24/7 support isn´t necessary, of course. It´s OK if a question is answered during common business hours.

I´ll have a look at your program and maybe I can be more specific then.