There's 2 new.gif images on the top right that aren't loading.

Fuck me sideways, I was thinking there were pics or movies missing, I'll get it fixed and resubmit

Thanks |potleaf|

Ok! You could to indicate mistake in these sites:
 

Ok! You could to indicate mistakes in these sites:


http://reallyteengirls.com/teen/hot-sexy-teeny-girls5/
http://reallyteengirls.com/teen/hot-sexy-teeny-girls2/


For both I have got same alike reasons rejection.
Big thanks for you!

This affiliate contacted me and said that his freesite was rejected, i thought no big deal, submitting doesn't guarantee it gets accepted right? I looked at it and the first thing I saw was no exit link. I figured that was the reason, but he said spelling and grammar|jester|

Now I know I aint all that good wit engrish an' all but MSWord said I wrote that stuff priddy goot

I know it is probably inappropriate for me to step in on behalf of an affiliate and I am sorry for that. It is just when he uses text that i wrote and it is turned down for that reason it kind of makes me look bad heh heh

so if I need to improve my grammar i would really appreciate tips (not sarcasm)

spaz :D :D

I stand by my original statement & ask that Round crosses me off his submit list until his English improves.

Understood (especially after you explained it to me :D ) I have basically told him the same thing. I just don't have time to write the text for each of his FS's :)

thanks for your time Greenie


spaz

Excuse me,Greenie.Ok. If you want-I never shall post to link-o-rama. Sorry.

Best Regards,Round

Your submission:
Site Name: Japanese Oral Sex Movies
Site URL: http://www.sexy-women-links.com/japa...al-sex-movies/
Category: AsianMovies

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Masked Content


What is masked content and where did I screw up so I don't do it again :)

Masked content is where they blur out some of the naked parts (very typical in Asian content)

Hi Greenie!

Your submission:
Site Name: Bbw Oral Sex
Site URL: http://www.penisexcited.com/mw1-2/index.html
Category: Oral

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Title Does Not Match Content

What Title Does Match Content? Advise please.

just submitted:
http://www.allaboutpussy.info/free-p...cks/index.html

few hours ago and got rejected for spelling error.

I've fixed them and i hope you don't mind me resubmit it just now. or i have to wait another 24 hour to resubmit it as the rules stated.

prolly needs more BJ pics, you list it as a blowjob site but the only pics that have anything to do with blowjobs are the last few in your galleries.

Thanks

Hello.....

Your submission:
Site Name: Naughty School Sluts
Site URL: http://www.adultvideofan.com/alexa/
Category: TeenSoloGirls

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Other - Please Contact Webmaster

Could you please advise? Thanks.....

I rejected it beacuse you had your index linked to /alexa1/ I see you fixed that but now looking further into the site. I see you have banners on the main page and galleries that are missleading.

Thanks for the quick response, I really appreciate it. Maybe I should put in some text that explains a little better where those banners link to.

If I may air my frustration for a sec..

Link-o-rama.com is incredibly hard to get listed on. I know, it's your site and you have to draw the line somewhere etc, but you have to realize that only the oldtimers will be able to walk this thin red line.

This last time the reason was "template overused", which seems funny because (to my knowledge) only *one* submission of mine has ever been accepted at link-o-rama.com... which used another template. And no, I'm not an amateur. Never had any complaints or problems at any other site/service, paid or otherwise.

So I redid the template and resubmitted.

"Template overused". Darn I forgot to change the galleries' colors. My bad.

This time I made an entirely new design, with a new layout, new texts, different pageflow, the works, and resubmitted.

"Connection issues". Well. The freesite is on a fast dual-core dual-cpu server with a low load avg. The only thing hosted on another server is the recip on the galleries. So I guess that must've been lagging at the time (logs show stats were running).

So I resubbed again - this time with a comment as I feared the reviewer was getting less and less amused by my persistence :)

"Template is overused".

Hum. This template has never been seen before (apart from rejecting it just before). It's completely different from anything I've ever subbed - up to and including fonts and warning texts.

I'm at my wits end. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the free submissions, don't expect any "level of service" and certainly don't doubt the honesty of the reviewers.

Question 1: If reviewers dislike the content (sex with older men - nothing dodgy though - not even remotely), will they just say so, instead of sending you off at a wild goose chase?

Question 2: Is it good practice to try and remedy a "rejection reason" and resubmit?

Question 3: Is link-o-rama.com worth my while? I've been trying to find out, but, well, can't get anything listed.

Thanks for listening.

Jab - It'd help if you posted some URL's :) PM me if you don't want them posted in public.

GG - any news on this submition please not had a mail to say reject nor listed

http://www.inbedwithfaith.org.uk/trial/index.html

To question #3 - yes, link-o-rama is worth your while :)

Quick question. If someone submits a picture gallery of a black woman posing in her clothes, what category does it belong to? Black Sex, Black Movies, Black Lesbians, and Black Nudes don't seem to be right.

Or are non-nude galleries rejected outright (even if the sponsor's page is hardcore)?

PM sent :)

Thanks. How about Q 1 and 2... anyone ?

Q1 - if a reveiwer does not like you content there then there is nothing you can do - its hardlines

Q2 - depends - if the site who rejected you send you traffic and you want that traffic then yes, however sometimes its better to just let that site go and move on trying not to make the same mistakes.

We all get rejected thats part of the game, the LL with the higher traffic have more submits so can be more critical and choosey.

You asked if its worth subing to Link O Rama - look around at this board all these people who are here know the value of not only submiting to LOR but also the site the webmasters here have.

Also if you can make the listing on LOR then 9 times of 10 you will get listed everywhere else, use GG's rules to build by and the rest really is easy. On the subject of design the most important thing its sticking to the basic rules while building, 3 links per page, 12 pics per page / 2 mins movie per page, about 9 / 12 recips all of which should have no more then 2 links blah blah - the rest will just come with experience.

Im still a newbie in my eyes I don't have all the answers though I try to learn from my mistakes, like you I am trying to track downa listing and to see why and how I screwed up - just another day in the life of a webmaster |cheers|

It was listed yesterday :)

I got your PM. As far as 1 & 2:
1 - you'd get a rejection reason along those lines (reviewer is uncomfortable with content, contact webmaster, etc) We never reject a site & use a false reason to fuck with the submitter.
2 - yes


I don't list galleries, I list free sites. But to answer the question, a woman posing in clothes is not porn (unless it's lingerie) so no, I would not list it.

We're not reviewing the sponsor on your site, we're reviewing your site.

Of course - the point is I do not know whether he likes it or not. Do they let you know?

I know it's a popular site. That doesn't necessarily mean it's worth the effort (redesign, rebuild, resubmit just to find it rejected again 99% of the time). But I gather it is.

Maybe I just had a streak of bad luck. Coincidental connection issues followed by some grammar mistake and by that time the template is starting to look mighty familiar to the reviewer :)

I am thinking that if the market is so saturated and link-o-rama.com is that popular, maybe holding onto the free submission model isn't the best idea. I can definitely say Greenie is often missing out on some excellent content due to often minute mistakes that can be easily fixed. But hey, it's free, so why bother Greenie with it - we should be glad he's even considering including it on his site.

Thing is, I'd much rather pay for an account that offers more detailed rejection reasons. Something like "That sentence sounds funny to an American - pls rephrase it and the freesite should be fine". Or "connection issues: that recip on gallery X isn't loading".

On can hardly ask for that level of detail in a free submission model.