![]() |
Quote:
The biggest nugget of trouble for the amateur section is that the DOJ has taken possible danger (small instances of underage photos taken through false ID or through mistakes we can't fathom) and replaced it with an imminent danger OR the death of a business for many small timers because their personal information is now posted for the creeps and ne'er-do-wells to abduct or victimize the good people that willingly expose themselves for these folks. That's the one that gets us. We have a family. We have a child that we treasure and do what we can to isolate her from the "treacherous or lacivious" activity that we perform in. The feds, locals or whoever could threaten our family now. That's the panic. I'm sorry, but when you threaten my family, or endanger those close to me, I don't panic, I react. I'm rational, but I'm also logical. It's still a crossroads for many of us that like to have the work, but not the notoriety of our neighbors knowing EXACTLY what we do for that living. Wolf. |
Juggernaut, no no and NO! You cannot use a mailboxes etc! You have to actually be there, and unless you can climb into that little box and work, you fail. That is a PO box, no matter how you want to play with it. DON'T SCREW AROUND AND TRY TO FIND EASY WAYS OUT. Remember, 5 years in a federal butt slamming prison is your reward.
No mail boxes - no drop boxes - no "suites"... just your real principle place of business. As for your videos, you need a model release, you need all the cross referencing, and you will need to name and track each performance (unique identifying code unless it has a hard URL unique to that video). You will need to track every thumb, still image, and anything else. EVERY IMAGE, EVERY VIDEO, EVERY CLIP... you need a cross referencing entry for each item. The DOJ wants to be able to say "This URL who are the models". or "this video who is in it" or "this gallery, show me all the model releases for the people on this gallery" or "this model, show me all the places you have images of her". Don't fuck around. Don't play cute games. You are EXACTLY the type of person the DOJ will love to meet. Alex |
Quote:
W |
Quote:
The last I remember in my classes at the seminary, is that God is willing to forgive us of our sins. There was a little jezebel in the bible that was allowed into heaven when she took the Lord as her Saviour and repented her sins. Maybe I have a different version of the Bible from the Christian Coalition. I really need to quit buying my books from Wal-Mart and discount stores. Apparently these publications have ghost writers that prepare extra text. Ultimately, I am saying, "Heather...you go girl!" W |
Quote:
We're preparing, and hoping for the best. But it's important that everyone understands that the risks of our rightwing brethren going to extremes is very real. If you don't vote, you might want to. If you vote without thought, you might want to change that. No one saw Hitler in such a light until the smoke cleared Auschwitz. Let's not make the same mistake. We are in more control than we realize, but it's not going to happen without the lawyers, and our own rise to response. Take heed. Action is privilege, no action is your circumstance. Ain't America grand!? Porn activists. Doesn't happen anywhere else. Wolf. (stopping the W. response for fear of being lumped into a partisan position) |
Quote:
Why do I now have a bad feeling about starting my up and coming website? |cry| |
Quote:
I'm hoping to open eyes. The implications of our gov't in these matters is relevant to more than just the life we lead as adult webmasters and porn models. There are so many things going on in and with our gov't that the loss of freedom looks like a small thing to deal with, as opposed to some of the other things. I love this business, and I like most of you folks. Those I don't like, I haven't met or talked with. Go forward with your site. There's no harm in it, and you have at least 28 days of freedom here. You are lucky to start it, the real pain in the arse is for anyone that has been in bidnezz since '95. Try to cross reference that long list of 10's or 100's of thousands of images and media. Wow! Good luck, don't be discouraged, but DO be careful!. Wolf |
Quote:
|
does anyone have any ideas about what kinfd of software they are gonna use for this
|
probably the same thing that SOD and Vice use.
Excel. :) |
Quote:
BTW, if you read through the 2257 regs, there was a mention of one comment suggesting the ability to use software to keep the documentation instead of only hard copies - that was my comment :D It's hard to believe that out of the entire adult industry, with all the big players involved, that only one person suggested that - did anyone else write in about this during the comment period last year? |
Quote:
|
ardentgent - you are responsible for what is published on your domain, and that will LIKELY include things like IFRAMES to other sites and images, banner, counters, and other things that are integrated into your page.
You cannot control what is on another site, you cannot edit it, therefore you are not producing it. However, linking to illegal content (CP, whatever) is still a major no-no. Alex |
Quote:
If I work 24 hours/day and document and cross reference 12 images/second, I can get the job done by June 23rd. Except that none of the content providers I've purchased from over the years has the info I need available for me yet. And I have the suspicion that I can't write fast enough to handle the 12 images/second pace. I might not even be able to stay awake for a whole month. I guess I'll be going to prison unless the stalkers get me first after I publish my address for the search engines to spider. |
Quote:
|
This shows promise http://www.my2257.com/ but it's not scheduled to be released until July 1, 2005 :(
|
will Excel do this
the files have to be cross linked and include the images and movies I do not think this is possable to do with paper because a small 15 pic gallery requries copys of the 15 pics and thumbnails plus the model relaese and the 2 forms of id |
trying to find info in a 12 page thread is ridiculous
|
I'm using Excel and each tab is a different model, click on the tab and a list of sites with copies of the content. i mgiht have to split it by pages..
|
I'm not sure if my idea about their crosslinking is right.
I understand this. For instance you have a set of 100 pics completely documented and filed. Out of that set you make 2 gals of lets say 15 pīcs. Each gal has a url. I think that now for each pic you have used in the gals, you have to update the original file of the set giving for each pic the url where you have used it. If you have used eg pic245 on both galleries, then you will find 2 url's for that pic in the original set documentation. And in the documentation of the gallery you will find a reference to the original set/picture. If it is something like this, then I think that it is not to difficult to make something in MS Access to keep track of all this. Might be easier then Excel. |
Quote:
When this scare surfaced, I started writing a routine using a database structure. I need to take a long weekend and finish it. |
I opened up access which someone told me is like excel
all i see is a bunch of cells I dont see how this would work |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Chop, I have to write this for a client this weekend -- I'd be more than happy to share work/ideas, etc. You have my email address.
Tommy, access is a database that requires definitions and forms to be defined. There are two things in the law that make me think that a machine dedicated to the purpose of license tracking is a good thing. 1) the records must be present and searchable via name, stage name, depiction location, title. 2) if it is on a machine shared with other activities, things could turn into a fishing expedition. I did find some very confusing reading regarding US Producers doing non-US shoots and have asked for clarification. For data recording purposes, I have what I need for this client, but, that is one confusing law as written. |
I don't see how any kind of automatic database search your server for pics is going to match up what pics belong to which 2257 document.
I figure I have over one million urls with pics. I would need a much lager monitor to view these spread sheets. I doubt that I would even remember what most of the models name's were or which content suppler they came from. I am very happy that I don't touch the teen niche. :) |
I am getting a number of requests for documentation from Thumb TGP's. I suspect the "big" sponsors are flooded.
Honestly, I do not see how a sponsor, in good conscience, is going to be able to just hand out model info. I would not mind hosting the thumb, but that would not comply. Sure hate to lose the traffic and some of those guys have been with me from the beginning. |
Jim & I have talked about opening a 2257 forum, but without a real live lawyer to moderate it, it's all just opinion....like this thread :)
You want good hard 2257 info? Get a lawyer :D |
Quote:
|
Don't underestimate access though never tested it with over a million records. But there are other relational db's.
For the people with huge amounts and fixed procedures it might be a good idea to (let) make some customized stuff. Perhaps with Oracle or so. |
And about Excel. I'm not sure but I have the feeling that you will have a lot of redundancy.
|
Quote:
|
juggernaut, I think you haven't read the 12 pages that have gone before this. I don't think you have read the regs as published... and that is a very important thing to do.
I don't have to go any further than the po box thing. That is a very basic thing covered clearly in the whole discussion from the DOJ. It is a serious issue that is causing endless stress to many people. I am not trying to jump on you, but I don't want anyone to get false hope or to take misguided suggestions as their solution for business, only to find out those solutions don't match up to the requirements of the law. If you are running a cam business, then you have it worse than most. The new requirements for storage of the original content is going to be a challenge. I wish you luck with it. Alex |
I've actually been giving a lot of thought to expanding my current Excel/HTML databases that I use for keeping track of banners, photos, page URLs, etc. They only run locally now (never been uploaded to my server), but I don't *think* that will be a major issue.
I haven't worked out all the details yet, but if I come up with something efficient and functional, I might be persuaded to share |cool| |
Quote:
|
SirMoby, You are 100% correct, I have spoken to 3 over the last 2 days, 3 different stories from each Attorney, And I refuse to pay for a forth opinion
|
Has anybody read this article...
https://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=...ticle&sid=9459 and thoughts? |
Quote:
|
Here's a question...and I am not asking for legal advice here. What are you all doing about dates of photos, etc. I am going back to 1999 with my own pictures and based on the computer I have stored them in, and based on my logo which has the year, I have a month and year for my pictures. But what kind of dates do the rest of you all keep? I mean, it's bad enough that we have to track each and every depiction but we have to add the date too? I cannot even imagine what content producers are facing if I have just myself and George to track. What a headache I have....
Linda |cry| |
RDBMS backend (why go commercial when you can go free?)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc