Hmm, my site http://www.free-daily-porn-pics.com/sweetalyssadoll/ just got declined but since there was no reason why in the mail I figured I'd ask here ;)

I've stopped giving direct reasons for rejection in the emails for a couple of reasons:
1. Those who care about why they were not listed are typically good submitters and they'll ask here.
2. It's good for the board.
3. I plan on having this thread surpassing the one for Jay's. :D

And for my pretty much petty reason for declining the site in question: The recips are too close together. Give them some room to breath so that surfers can know which one they're click on. I did get a bunch of sites over the last couple of days with this same content, but I'd be more than happy to list it if you increased the column height of those recips.

OK, cool, thx UW :)

I fixed it but before I resubmit could you please take a look?
http://www.free-daily-porn-pics.com/sweetalyssadoll/

As for the content being overused, that's a big problem with solo girl sites :(
I'm starting to focus more and more on those kind of sites but I guess it must be frustrating for you guys to get the same content submitted over and over again.. This one is a brand new program so I thought I would be one of the first to submit this content but apparently not :(

Thx again for your time :)

;) Hehe, I said column HEIGHT, not width. In other words, increase the

LOL, sorry dude, I hate tables and I always manage to screw them up if I mess around too much with them. I think I got it right this time lol, wanna look again?

Thx :)

Nice :)


is our friend.

But cellpadding is king. :)

Beautiful |thumb Now, could you change the bgcolor for me? Ha! Just kidding. :D

It's perfect dude - sorry for the runaround.

LOL cool, I'll resubmit now and pay more attention to my table heights in the future ;)

BTW, how about submitting solo girl sites? Is that OK or not? I'm getting a bit fed up of promoting overpromoted huge sponsors ;)

Of course. If it's legal and make my nuts tingle, I'm willing to list it all.

Oh, and I didn't mean to imply that the content of that site was overused. I don't know if it was just released or what, but I suddenly got a bunch of submissions of the same girl. I can't recall whether it was the same pic set or not as more than 10 minutes has passed and I have an amazingly bad memory. ;) Luckily, she's friggin' hot.

LOL ok

You're damn right, she's hot! I'd love to stick my banana in her peach |headbang|

As for the sudden bunch of submissions: the program owner had a $50 free give away for new accounts and the min payout is $100 ;)

Hello.
Please explain me also why i didn't listed?
http://hqpornforum.com/shavingpussy/hair/

Find a new host and resumit. You'll have to remove the link to your root from your 2257 page also, but the primary reason for decline was your host.

Just a little heads up - I just declined a lot more sites than typical. I won't be back to respond until tomorrow evening, so don't get nervous thinking that I'm ignoring your questions.

I was wondering if you could tell me why this site was rejected?

http://realitypornblog.com/solo-girl/brooke-skye/

Thanks.. :)

Hello everyone .

First of all i'm glad I joined this great board and I hope I will make many friends here :)

My site http://www.adultsecret.net/sites/040/1/index.htm was declined at Javes and I would like to know what was wrong with it, so that I can fix the problem.

You've created a false enter by using the paysites name in the title of the free site and in the first text link on the indes: FEATURED PREMIUM TEEN SOLO GIRL SITE: BROOKE SKYE. If that text had been attached to a graphic banner, I wouldn't have perceived it as blind, or if it had said BrookeSkye.com, that would have been fine too. Surfers are looking for a 'Brooke Skye' because the title and they'll click that link thinking leads to the next page of the free site. And yes, before you ask anyone - I am fairly anal. ;)

Ah, took me awhile to figure that one out. That was me being REALLY anal. You can resubmit it without changing it and I'll list it. I had so many blind(ish) links last night that I started penalizing everyone.

The little media player on the hpa that says "Click Here! View Free Video" would have been blind if it was by itself, but it's obviously part of a larger graphic ad. That was my bad. I was reviewing with a hatchet in my hand a thirst for blood. You have my apologies. :(

Are you the only reviewer? Reason I ask is because I've had site(s) listed on Javes before using the "Premium" link feature.

And I've also used the sites name in my titles before, got listed then too.

You're weird... :D

I got declined for this site: http://www.darthporno.com/fetishfill/feet-site/

I think it's probably blind links but want to make sure before I resubmit after I fix it.

First link, right on top of the index with no supporting graphic. "Take a look at what a footjob model can really do!" You've used the words from the paysite in the description (FootjobModels.com) but you didn't use them as a site name.

The second text link is even more blind, but I'm more lenient on potentially blind links that are posed closely to the obvious Enter link for the site. I assume that only the most stupid or drunk surfer would click that accidentally.

Yes, well..., I'm supposed to be. There was a time that Jim liked to go in and accept everything, but he has stopped doing that. :D Plus, it's highly possible that I would accept the same site on any given day, depending how interpreted the text at that time. I judge the index and the main pages the most harshly. The further away the navigation links are from the top of the page, the more skeptical I am about the use of words along the way.

No argument there. ;)

I'll keep in mind next time around to word it differently. I would go in and change it to make it acceptable but I've already been listed by some of the other LLs on the page.. :(

I only approved partner accounts :) Since you told me not to, I have stayed away. But, I notice more and more submissions everyday.

Yup, more and more everyday. I blame this thread. :D It makes submitters very aware of Javes, which is a good thing.

My goal is to have this thread surpass Jay's big ass thread and we are well on our way. |thumb Oh, and I don't mean to make it surpass his thread by intentionally rejecting people, but by informing them when they have been rejected. I may be a prick of a reviewer, but almost anything I reject I am more than willing to accept upon minor modifications. |mml|

You are doing a great job Useless. And I have noticed this thread getting really large, quickly.