Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Blogs and Blogging (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Thanx from a lazy fuck (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=32430)

T Pat 2006-06-21 09:23 PM

Thanx from a lazy fuck
 
Chop, Useless and docholly you guys (and gal) motivated me to finale get off my ass and set up some blogs that I bought the domains for 6 or 8 months ago off of ebay.
I tried to use another feed aggregater and that bogged me down for a few hours, then I used the feed Useless recomended http://projects.radgeek.com/feedwordpress
So end result 4 blogs took me less than 4 hours (not counting wasted time fucking with that other feed aggregater) and you guys do the updateing for me:D
It just can't get easier than that|bananna| Thanx |thumb
If you want to see your feeds on someone elses blogs, here ya go
http://www.xxxfine.com
http://www.xxxsold.com
http://www.xxxsafe.com
http://www.xxxused.com

Chop Smith 2006-06-21 09:34 PM

Gosh TPat, I hope it is profitable for all of us. Or are you building these out of love to surfers? :D

Useless 2006-06-21 11:44 PM

Excellent Pat. |headbang| Until today, I've only seen the feeds on the couple of sites that we tested them on. I can't even express how good it feels to see them put to good use.

T Pat 2006-06-22 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
I can't even express how good it feels

Now that's got to be a first:D
It took me hours to write a post for hot-latina-links today and less than a minute to update my 4 new blogs I'm really liking this|thumb

Jel 2006-06-24 01:31 AM

Pat, reading your initial post got me off my lazy ass and with UW's help I managed to get my blog utilising Chop's Cash (Check Chop & UW's sig people!) feeds and not only is it a cinch for a technical dumbass like me, the posts fit in with my layout perfectly, no running in and out into the sidebars or any of that shit.

Awesome job guys, awesome!

walrus 2006-06-24 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel
Pat, reading your initial post got me off my lazy ass and with UW's help I managed to get my blog utilising Chop's Cash (Check Chop & UW's sig people!) feeds and not only is it a cinch for a technical dumbass like me, the posts fit in with my layout perfectly, no running in and out into the sidebars or any of that shit.

Awesome job guys, awesome!

Too keep the kudo's flowing, since Jel's blog is a part of XXX Blog Feeds, the feed even makes it into his sites RSS feed and into my blog, affiliate code in tact.

Boogie 2006-06-25 04:07 PM

this thread got me to get up off my ass and set up some old blogs I dont update any more to autoupdate chops feeds and more ;)

love this thread. lets make out

docholly 2006-06-26 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boogie
this thread got me to get up off my ass and set up some old blogs I dont update any more to autoupdate chops feeds and more ;)

love this thread. lets make out

and i'm very happy to see at least someone is using the Uniform and Stocking blogs..
:D

*PSSSST*.. yes that is a BIG assed hint!! :D

oast 2006-06-26 04:35 AM

I'm using 5 feeds (including Uniforms AND Stockings) from Chops Cash on my blog at adultweblogger.com (thanks guys) and will be utilising a couple (or more) at my new site mysexposts.com

Preacher 2006-06-26 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by walrus
Too keep the kudo's flowing, since Jel's blog is a part of XXX Blog Feeds, the feed even makes it into his sites RSS feed and into my blog, affiliate code in tact.

That's cool, but isn't this also problematic. For example, Jel and I are both listed on XXX blog feeds and pornpig (I believe) - two aggregators for people not in the know. So if Jel and I both put Useless' feed into our blogs, aren't you going to see at least one duplicate entry of this content on your aggregators?

And truth be told, we're a small community of bloggers on this board and I'm sure most of us promote Useless because he is so gad-damn sexy for someone who is only 4'3" (judging purely by the sound of his voice or course). Point being I think several of us would add his feed to our main blogs if not for this aggregator duplication issue.

Or am I just over-thinking things? |loony|

Useless 2006-06-26 11:02 PM

I think you have a valid point there, Preacher, even if you did make that horrible comment about my voice which will probably land me 3 more years of therapy. ;)

Obviously, I aggregate all 8 of our feeds on my lovely porn blogs page. And so do a couple of the blogs of board members which I pull. The other day I noticed that two of the hosted blog posts of the same title were listed one right after the other; one with my affiliate code, the other with someone else's. I could easily have gone to my admin and yanked the repeated post, but since it was promoting the program which is nearest and dearest to my heart, I left it in. |shocking| I would expect any 'normal' blog owner would and should, for the sake of having a quality blog, remove repeat posts like that.

Preacher 2006-06-26 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
I think you have a valid point there, Preacher, even if you did make that horrible comment about my voice which will probably land me 3 more years of therapy. ;)

Your welcome. Therapy rocks, it's where they pass out the best drugs! |thumb

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
blah, blah, blah...I would expect any 'normal' blog owner would and should, for the sake of having a quality blog, remove repeat posts like that.

That goes against my whole unfounded belief that aggregators are supposed to be hands free.

I mean Hell, if you aggregator guys are actually reading my blog entries then you know how just how messed up I really am. |loony|

Preacher 2006-06-27 12:02 AM

Just to sound completely insane and reply to myself...I just went to pornpig and I love Alex so this isn't anything against him, but of the last 5 posts on pornpig right now there is a post and right below it a duplicate post. Then an original post, followed by another set of duplicates.

walrus 2006-06-27 01:32 AM

Actually, you do point out an interesting problem for which I have no good solution...I would be against deleting posts of one webmaster in favor of another...and on the other hand, it would do the site no good to have the same post multiple times.

My only solution would be to work with the individual webmasters to try to come to some type of solutions....if none could be found, then I guess I'd have to be an asshole and decide which feed was more productive for the site and go with that.

Simon 2006-06-27 08:19 AM

I agree that the dupe posts problem really needs a(n almost) hands-off solution. This might be a good point for discussion on tonight's radio show since Boogie is the guest and it's supposed to be blog-focused.

I'd like to incorporate all 8 of dead-sexy's feeds in my blog projects too, and I can see what a nightmare this could grow into as more quality RSS feeds are offered by sponsors (with working brains).

docholly 2006-06-27 08:58 AM

I haven't run this by our guru of blogs yet..so this may or may not be possible.. but for those who are more familiar with wordpress .. can you not go in to your admin once our blog posts are fed into your blog and edit the time and date? so you know that ASAIG current blog posted on 6/28 at 615am. you could effectively go in and change that date to say 6/29 or 6/30.. thus it would post later on the aggregators and not be duped by them one after another? Just an idea.

Also as a side note: the original intent of this was to provide QUALITY key word rich posts for bloggers and to give you options as to filling in your sidebar links with "friends" blogs. This is especially good to retain bookmarkers to your blog because they know, if you use all 8 dead-sexy blogs, that at least 1 per day your blog will be updated. |boobies|

Tennis anyone??? :D

ponygirl 2006-06-27 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docholly
Also as a side note: the original intent of this was to provide QUALITY key word rich posts for bloggers and to give you options as to filling in your sidebar links with "friends" blogs. This is especially good to retain bookmarkers to your blog because they know, if you use all 8 dead-sexy blogs, that at least 1 per day your blog will be updated.

see that's what I thought they would be for - the sidebar links. I still haven't got the hang of the RSS stuff yet. That's what you get when you just jump in & figure it out as you go along |loony|

I'm sure this will get addressed on the show tonite so hopefully I'll learn something :)

Useless 2006-06-27 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docholly
... for those who are more familiar with wordpress .. can you not go in to your admin once our blog posts are fed into your blog and edit the time and date?

Once you have aggregated a feed into your blog, the content of its posts are fully under your control and appear in your WP admin just like any post you have written yourself. You could edit the body text, the title, the date, whatever.

But the issue is, it really sucks that anyone would have to do anything manually. In my opinion, the very nicest thing about using feeds is that you get all of that content by simply clicking 'update feeds'. Now, if you are running a big aggregator and you're pulling down a ton of feeds, dupe posts wouldn't be all that noticeable and not really something to worry about. On a smaller personal blog, where the content is mostly your own posts and a couple of aggregated feeds, then it will be far more noticeable.

ponygirl 2006-06-27 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
Once you have aggregated a feed into your blog, the content of its posts are fully under your control and appear in your WP admin just like any post you have written yourself. You could edit the body text, the title, the date, whatever.

ok I need some help here :) when you get the feed added in, does it publish a post everytime the blog is updated? I guess what I'm asking is if you have initial control over when a post goes live or if they're automatically added to the page. Does that make sense? |loony|

Useless 2006-06-27 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ponygirl
ok I need some help here :) when you get the feed added in, does it publish a post everytime the blog is updated? I guess what I'm asking is if you have initial control over when a post goes live or if they're automatically added to the page. Does that make sense? |loony|

It depends on the Aggregator you use. I use FeedWordPress, in which you can choose to allow the feed posts to be automatically published to your page or held as drafts. So, you could pick and choose which posts make it to your blog. You could edit them before they are published to your blog as well.

ponygirl 2006-06-27 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
It depends on the Aggregator you use. I use FeedWordPress, in which you can choose to allow the feed posts to be automatically published to your page or held as drafts. So, you could pick and choose which posts make it to your blog. You could edit them before they are published to your blog as well.

ok, now I'm getting a little excited about this :D

I'm looking at FeedWordPress, it all sounds rather complicated but hell, I love a challenge. There goes my day lol.

so what is the etiquette on editing posts? It doesn't sound right that you can change them if you're pulling someone elses post. But if it's a program blog, I guess that makes it your own post, really - right?

Useless 2006-06-27 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ponygirl
so what is the etiquette on editing posts? It doesn't sound right that you can change them if you're pulling someone elses post. But if it's a program blog, I guess that makes it your own post, really - right?

Yeah, I wouldn't see any harm in editing a sponsor's post in any manner, as long as it still promotes the contributing sponsor when all is said and done. I wouldn't edit a fellow webmaster's posts unless you see a seriously mispelled word that isn't going to let you sleep at night. ;)

docholly 2006-06-27 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
Yeah, I wouldn't see any harm in editing a sponsor's post in any manner, as long as it still promotes the contributing sponsor when all is said and done. I wouldn't edit a fellow webmaster's posts unless you see a seriously mispelled word that isn't going to let you sleep at night. ;)

I think i need spell check.. lmao

Toby 2006-06-27 12:12 PM

Is there a spell checker plugin for WP? That would be very useful.

Useless 2006-06-27 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toby
Is there a spell checker plugin for WP? That would be very useful.

I don't see the option in a defaut install if you use the "Visual Rich Editor". However, if you go to Options > Writing and unclick "Users should use the visual rich editor by default", you'll now see a button (when writing or managing posts) which reads "lookup" in your many, many editing options. Highlight some text and you'll see that it queries Answers.com for you. If you hightlight a single word, it'll take you right to the Answers.com definition of that word.

Toby 2006-06-27 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
If you hightlight a single word, it'll take you right to the Answers.com definition of that word.

That'll work, thx

RawAlex 2006-06-27 03:55 PM

If you allow you feeds to be aggregated, then you should not be putting other aggregate material in them. Quite simply, if I continue to see duplicate posts on pornpig, I will elminate one or other of the feeds and assume that there is not enough original material on the blog.

If you want to aggregate stuff, start your own aggregation site and list your sites on it rather than screwing up your existing site.

RawAlex 2006-06-27 04:09 PM

I just want to add this: Pornpig's intention is to aggregate UNIQUE blogs into a format that drives you traffic, views, and exposure for your unique work. When your blog becomes mostly someone else's work, I can no longer aggregate the content, because the risk of duplication (and see here) is a bit overwhelming, even in small numbers.

Jel, for the moment Ihave disabled your feed into the blog and removed the obvious duplicate posts from the front page of the site. If your blog returns to a unique situation, I don't have a problem re-adding it, but I cannot aggregate blogs that are pre-aggregated other source material in this manner.

Anyone else interested or want to discuss it, email alex@monolithnet.com

walrus 2006-06-27 05:08 PM

I haven't actually had a chance to try this....hopefully I will soon.

It should be possible to add the feeds into pages on your blog instead of posts. I know there is a plug-in that will let you run PHP in a page and I'm thinking of trying an aggregator like Carp to actually add the feeds onto the page. You'll only have the most recent posts (however many are output by the sponsor) and not the history but I still think it could be cool plus it would allow you to use the feeds and maintain your blogs individuality.

I think I saw something....somewhere that would allow you to treat page links differently than the default WP install does. If anyone has any ideas, I'd like to take a look at them...or I guess I'll investigate over the weekend.

Useless 2006-06-27 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by walrus
I haven't actually had a chance to try this....hopefully I will soon.

It should be possible to add the feeds into pages on your blog instead of posts. I know there is a plug-in that will let you run PHP in a page and I'm thinking of trying an aggregator like Carp to actually add the feeds onto the page. You'll only have the most recent posts (however many are output by the sponsor) and not the history but I still think it could be cool plus it would allow you to use the feeds and maintain your blogs individuality.

Exec-PHP allows you execute PHP in WP's posts and pages.

Try to ignore the sloppiness of the next site link I give you - I use it for testing stuff out. ;) Anyway, this is a WP page with Exec-PHP activated and using that new tool we released on Monday. http://www.maladapted.com/?page_id=288 So yes, you can run feeds on a WP page. You should be able to install a third-party aggregator and pull any feeds you wish. There may be a plugin aggregator for use on pages, but I haven't stumbled on one yet.

And, as you assert, this would allow bloggers to employ feeds on their blogs they wish to submit to aggregators like "Porn Pig" without the worry of having your sponsor aggregated content killing the uniqueness or decreasing the value of your blog's feed. Of course, this would also disclude you the opportunity of getting your affiliate coded posts into Technorati and the like.

walrus 2006-06-27 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
Of course, this would also disclude you the opportunity of getting your affiliate coded posts into Technorati and the like.

Since your not tagging your posts, this would be a fairly minor loss as only the categories would get translated anyway.

Useless 2006-06-27 07:33 PM

That hurts. :D

Useless 2006-06-27 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by walrus
Since your not tagging your posts, this would be a fairly minor loss as only the categories would get translated anyway.

Walrus, my journey to learn more about his tagging voodoo has lead me back to one of your threads. Am I to understand that tagging is nothing more than adding rel="tag" within my anchor tags? So would 'tag' the words I've chose to link? If that's so, I'll go hardcode that into our system right now.

Please help me make sense of this stuff.
|pcsucks|

walrus 2006-06-27 10:14 PM

Exactly....

Useless 2006-06-27 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by walrus
Exactly....

Great! Thanks Walrus. You've been a very big help to me all long the way.

Looks like I have to go edit 8 copies of quicktags.js |thumb

Chop Smith 2006-06-28 12:00 AM

Damn, I have got to quit reading this thread or I will post some mushy crap about how much this board and its members have meant to me and the 'staff's" little program.

Jel 2006-06-28 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex
I just want to add this: Pornpig's intention is to aggregate UNIQUE blogs into a format that drives you traffic, views, and exposure for your unique work. When your blog becomes mostly someone else's work, I can no longer aggregate the content, because the risk of duplication (and see here) is a bit overwhelming, even in small numbers.

Jel, for the moment Ihave disabled your feed into the blog and removed the obvious duplicate posts from the front page of the site. If your blog returns to a unique situation, I don't have a problem re-adding it, but I cannot aggregate blogs that are pre-aggregated other source material in this manner.

Anyone else interested or want to discuss it, email alex@monolithnet.com

Hi Alex,

I see totally where you're coming from and that's no problem at all. Looking at the other posts and trying to work out how I can get around it. Just recently woke here so a little foggy in the brain right now lol.

Simon 2006-06-28 07:54 AM

Could someone hit me up later on icq about what needs to be changed in the quicktags.js to make the tagging work automatically? (Or maybe it's worth posting here for others too.)

Working on new mantra:
"If it's not worth automating, it's not worth doing again."

Useless 2006-06-28 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon
Could someone hit me up later on icq about what needs to be changed in the quicktags.js to make the tagging work automatically? (Or maybe it's worth posting here for others too.)

For sure. I'll tell you, but don't tell the rest of these clowns. Okay? ;) Quicktags.js is used for writing/editing posts when you are NOT using that crappy Visual Rich Editor, but I'm unsure if it's used if you are using the VRE.

Open -
wp-includes/js/quicktags.js

Look for (pretty much at the end of the file)-
Code:

function edInsertLink(myField, i, defaultValue) {
        if (!defaultValue) {
                defaultValue = 'http://';
        }
        if (!edCheckOpenTags(i)) {
                var URL = prompt('Enter the URL' ,defaultValue);
                if (URL) {
                        edButtons[i].tagStart = '';
                        edInsertTag(myField, i);
                }
        }
        else {
                edInsertTag(myField, i);
        }
}

Change -
edButtons[i].tagStart = '
';
to-
edButtons[i].tagStart = '

oast 2006-06-28 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
Code:

function edInsertLink(myField, i, defaultValue) {
        if (!defaultValue) {
                defaultValue = 'http://';
        }
        if (!edCheckOpenTags(i)) {
                var URL = prompt('Enter the URL' ,defaultValue);
                if (URL) {
                        edButtons[i].tagStart = '';
                        edInsertTag(myField, i);
                }
        }
        else {
                edInsertTag(myField, i);
        }
}

Change -
edButtons[i].tagStart = '
';
to-
edButtons[i].tagStart = '
If, like me, you use different 'rels' for different types of link, you could prompt for the rel to use:
Code:

function edInsertLink(myField, i, defaultValue) {
        if (!defaultValue) {
                defaultValue = 'http://';
        }
        if (!edCheckOpenTags(i)) {
                var URL = prompt('Enter the URL' ,defaultValue);
                var REL = prompt('Enter the rel' ,'external');
                if (URL) {
                        edButtons[i].tagStart = '';
                        edInsertTag(myField, i);
                }
        }
        else {
                edInsertTag(myField, i);
        }
}

Substitute 'external' for the rel you use most often.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc