![]() |
My Rejected Link
Hey, my link was rejected and it said I should contact webmaster so I'm thinking it might me something important and I should get over here.
Here's the link http://www.lateteen.net/free/brandi/linkorama/ Sorry if it's just crap but the message made me think it might be something worse than that |waves| |
Who are you directing the question to? There is a thread for link o rama that can be found here
Do you build a site for each specific link list in your recip group? http://www.lateteen.net/free/brandi/smutgremlins/ |
Probably because you have the link list name in the URL.
|
Quote:
Thanks |
Quote:
http://www.smutnut.org/free/shower/ and I wasn't sure who was sending me the hits and so decided to start tagging them like I do my gallery submits. Not that I'd ever stop submitting to green guy, but wanted to know who was sending me all those hits and was pissed i couldn't figure it out. |
Thanks for your responses though
|
Quote:
Thank you |
Quote:
I'm not concerned with Smut Gremlin or Green Guy but concerned about these link lists I don't know or not accepting me or I'm not familiar with getting hits back from you guys and don't deserve it also. This way I can gang up the guys who do for me with the guys that do for each other. Maybe there's some other problem. Don't know |
Quote:
Use your head. |
Quote:
The only reason I'm even here though is because I got a message in the rejection to contact webmaster and it came from linkorama so I thought I should do this. Normally I would eat it and say tell myself do better next time but I'm still sort of new at the link list stuff since my main thing is galleries Maybe I should just reply to the email because it could have been 404 or 503's or something. Like I said I posted a link to this thread from the link you gave me though |
Quote:
I don't get this post. I just clicked but don't get the reference. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm bad apologies. I'll figure another way to do this. Everything was cool before so I'll stick to what I was doing. Apologies |
Quote:
Hey, thanks. Guess you hit it right on the head. Like I said, just sort of started free site stuff and still working to get it down. I owe you. Thanks |
Quote:
But how would NOT using a link list's name in your URL muck with the way you choose to arrange your reciprocal links? |huh |
Quote:
Actually a better question would have been is this a general rule with all link lists or GG specific rule. I'm getting accepted by most using this method so it doesn't seem to be a problem so I guess I answered my own question. If it's just GG that's easy, cause I'll just call that particular folder something else. Basically it's just a tracking method I was using and was leery when I first started it on gallery submissions but didn't appear to have a problem. Again, It's on me. But I know now so I'll make sure not to do this with GG at the very least. |
You might be better abreviating the urls instead of using the full name if you're gonna do it that way.
As it was mentioned in that other thread, it looks like you're trying to thieve SE traffic which would fuck anyone off including you if someone was doing the same. LL owners might be miserable fuckers but if you play fair then they will. |
Quote:
My whole idea is that certain LL's are leeching off of others, and once I see my stats after a certain amount of time, i'll know exactly who's doing what (at least for me) and return the favor to others. If you were from GG telling me this I'd think something crazy and I know he's the hun of link lists so that's why I'm concerned about why this was such a big deal to begin with. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm just saying, it benefits me and the people who accept me and get me hits to be moved up to being to a link list like this if I can judge and analyze the sites that deserve it. Don't you think? I already have my next post planned and believe me, the rules while be in compliance with GG I'm hoping but why would anyone want me to keep linking them up with LL's that don't do shit. I'll give a for instance. Jay's Links. Huge site, right? And I'm even promoting one of his major sponsers, but I don't see one hit in my server stats from him. Well, maybe I'll email him but in the mean time, why does anyone want a blank recip link when maybe I'll move him down and move someone up that will send hits to other LL's on my main submission page. Does this make sense or am I out there thieving and stuff? |
Quote:
All trying to rip SE traffic from LLs. I get fucked off with fuckhead spammers using my sites as keywords to spam AFF but i bet it's nothing compared to what the link lists get. Your intensions maybe not be anything like that but how is anyone to know? If your sites appear in the serps on their names then effectively you are traffic thieving by using those urls. |
Quote:
I try to give back what I get without cutting my own dick off! Again, thanks for your efforts and response back to me trying to enlighten me. If I can now or in the future pay you back, please let me know how?|headbang| |
Quote:
Just to clear things up! GG knows all this I think. |
I don't think anything, just gave an idea on why it got rejected after reading that other thread.
I don't submit to LL and haven't done for years as i don't do porn sites anymore, got bored of all the bullshit of it. All my sites years ago were listed by greenie and others and if they were ever rejected for a reason, i changed anything they wanted to get them listed. Whatever it is though, i'm sure you'll change and get listed. :) |
Quote:
Love your avatar by the way|thumb |
Havent we gone through this a couple times with the same results? Its like Deja Vu!
J- |jester| |
Charlie, if I'm reading your method right, you are creating copies of your warning page so that in effect, Linklist A links to page A and gets traffic back only from that page. Linklist B links to page B and gets traffic back only from that page and so on. That would mean there's no interchanging of traffic.
LL's want you to have a minimum of other sites on your recip page because they want a pool of traffic created there, of which some surfers would get back to the LL (not the same ones it sent you). The way you do that, they lose on that traffic and your recip becomes as invaluable as a link from a page with only one recip. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just seems like a lot of work to do it the way you are. And easier for LL's to know they're not losing out. |
Quote:
Am I making any sense here? |
Quote:
But I figure if the LL sent the surfer to my page then it becomes my job to send the surfer to the sponsor, so the only thing I keep track of for stats is how many hits each LL sends me. Micro analyzing which LL's hits are better than another's would completely drive me insane. I'm much happier trying to figure out what I can do to drive surfers to a join page, which is a difficult enough job for me. I check my stats once a day, cash my checks once a week and I don't think I miss out on too many trends. Micro analysis would make my lazy ass even less productive than it already is ;) |
Quote:
I just figured I'd do the same thing with LL's, although maybe most of these are probably legit anyway and I'm just wasting my time. Still I find some that block me or give me 404 pages after submission and etc., It really started more for the recips than me but than I noticed this added benefit. Like I said I'm sort of new at the free site thing |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc