Would you list this freesite powered by javascript?
 

I know many of us now are accepting freesites from trusted submitters with javascript on 'em, well... how about this, would you list it?

http://www.tastytinytits.com/ifs/flat-chested-girls/

The reason I ask is because the contents of the warning, main, and gallery pages are actually all on a single page; when the surfer clicks on the typical freesite navigation links, javascript selectively hides and reveals different elements so the surfer is given a simulated 4-page experience.

If the surfer has javascript disabled, this is what the page looks like:
http://www.tastytinytits.com/ifs/fla...ted-girls/#all

It's powered by a little library I put together which I've named InterActive Static, and I'm making it free for all of you to use if you want. If you're familiar with CSS this script should be relatively easy to use even if you don't know any javascript. If you have any trouble making it work for you, use my comment form. :)

Why would I build a freesite this way?

I have a few reasons, but the #1 reason is: faster production times (writing ad copy for 1 page versus 4 pages) with no sacrifice of value to the freesite (in fact, I think it might make a freesite more valuable).

I'd list it.

We'd list it too. I've built one using JQuery on the front page and that got listed, and that is all java script driven, and everyone seemed to list it. |thumb

What happens when SE's spider it, do they just see the non-java script page?

I think this is what the SE spiders would see:

http://www.tastytinytits.com/ifs/fla...ted-girls/#all

So if I link to one of the gallery 'pages' on my TGP (which I always do), or if a 'page' gets bookmarked on a social network site, of this url:

http://www.tastytinytits.com/ifs/fla...ed-girls/#gal1

I think there would be a more consistent treatment of the site as a whole, versus 4 separate pages potentially all competing for attention.

However, the SE's are getting pretty crafty, the big two engines (Google and Bing/Yahoo) might already be able to read javascript. It's actually pretty easy to simulate a browser (and allow javascript) when crawling a page, I think the only reason why they might not is because doing so uses a lot more system resources.

I'm gonna clean up a bit more code, and hopefully I'll have this site submitted today, with many more to follow. I'd like to do 3 submits a day. |thumb

Looks great |thumb
What I really like is the social plugin on image pages.
And I'd list this as well :)

It looks fine for me

looks ok|virgohippy|

No problems here