EvilFubAr |
2009-01-06 09:44 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfoGuy
(Post 435507)
More than 1/2 of the listed websites are smut.com subdomains. Personally, I think if someone is serious about running a legitimate adult business, they should use their own domain name on a paid server.
|
Those are webmaster BLOGS from our free hosted BLOG service. Hence thats why they submitted them to a BLOG directory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemanspiff
(Post 435529)
When is was looking at it this morning, I was finding a lot of full length videos. I was just wondering why anyone would need a paysite with all those full length videos. |huh
|
There were a few that started redirecting to another URL that had full length, I deleted them from the db.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagan
(Post 435530)
A lot of the paysites release shorter, poor quality clips for us to use as teasers, with the promise of better quality, longer videos once the visitors join. Why would any sponsor in their right minds release the good stuff for free? Make them short, cut them off right before the good stuff, and make them of a lower quality. I have no issues with any of that.. but... why bother keeping a paysite up if you are going to allow the tube sites to have your best stuff for free?
|
The longest promo clips I have seen given out are like 5 min which I think are too long. Its more for branding purposes, but tube owners still use them. Our program HDpays.com gives out 1 min clips, which I think are the ideal length.
I dont have anything against a legal tube site. They are the new TGP and there isnt anything you can do or say that will stop it. The term "tube" is rising fast on google. "tube porn" alone is up to 5 million searches a month.
When done right, its a better way to view promo content, and surfers understand the layout. Its an industry shift and you should be on board. There will just be a battle between legal owners and people who have full videos and allow uploads.
|