Non nude teens goes ? --->
 

Hi, I've recently felt a rush (or whatever it should be called ) to promote some non nude websites, mostly because the girls look so nice and rebills are also good.
The question is where to put (under which category) a non nude teen , lets say like www.nextdoornikki.com to convert ?

If LL owners will accept her under teens, then its ok I think it suits her best, but some of you dont like the lack of full nudity and such so I guess I'll have to find another category for her... which one ? Lingerie ? Hmm that doesnt sound too good...
What will you do ?

Non nude goes, well, not on adult link sites?

Try non nude top lists and such.

Alex

If they're in lingerie or bra/panties you could submit to those categories.

Thanks for the replys, I think I'll try them with lingerie niche.

We don't discriminate against non-nude galleries. It's not like we get so many of them that it annoys the surfers who just want to see gash.

I was more thinking of the Sears catalog which I guess now is the K-Mart catalog.

The problem I run across is this: non-nude has been (and will continue to be) a kiddie porn term. It is used mostly to describe underage model sites where the girl poses provocatively but never actually gets naked. They are baby step sites for pedophiles.

For the most part, visiting those sites tends to put you about 1 click away from actual KP. Most of them play top lists and such, and they get mixed in with harder KP sites that are really sick.

I had this debate on another board with a program operator (and good friend of mine) who launched a series of "non nude tours" for his solo girl amateur sites. I just find it is an objectionable way to pander down to KP keywords looking for traffic.

Might as well allow "******" and "young teens" back into the game too... |angry|

Alex

Maybe what Alex said makes sense, catering to the KP sickos. I don't really like the sounds of that. I wondered why the tours were non nude on some of these sites. I figured it was just the "tease".

NextDoorNikki and other sites I know I usually take in Lingerie if there is panties or bra, like Greenguy said.

I have a question. You mean inside NextDoorNikki there is NO nudity at all? Like paying members get NO nudity?

No paying members get no nudity, but the stuff sells decently

maybe some wet tshirts shots and videos

the members area just as a lot of bikini and lingerie stuff, some tight jeans and shorts

I think it sells because the girls are hot and its very original

it says on the sites that all models are over 18 years of age
http://www.nextdoornikki.com/2257.html

Hmmm, no nudity. Wow.

Being a boob lover myself I can see why they'd join. She's stacked. But I wouldn't stay a member very long. Of course a lot of members fall in love and if the girl replys to emails a member might stay forever.

In the end, can we all stay away from the term "non-nude" and move to something a little nicer, like "sexy models" or "teasing babes"... non-nude is a KP term, and it's really not a good idea to play with it.

Alex

SOrry to be off topic, but ain't that some shit!

Gotta agree with Tommy, there is no nudity inside member area (well maybe a pic or two but its rather an accidental nipple ). And gotta agree it sells decently - looks like people also like to look at really sexy girls in the most teasing poses. The rebills are also nice , but It might be because (in case of nextdoornikki) she chats with the members , makes live cam shows and generally there is a connection with her and her members.

Hell, I'm a straight woman, and I think NextDoorNikkie is fuckable.

Princess BlueYez is my personal favorite though. ;)


Not so long ago I hooked up with a guy who was starting a non nude site. Took me awhile to figure out the appeal of them, as they are clothed, and scads of chicks are taking it off.

But it all lies in the 'less is more' concept...the tease...and the relationship with the individual girl.

As to what to do with them, it helps if the photog goes for the niche inside of the niche, like GG said. Phil Flash seems to be good at that.

non nude goes with me to softcore cat|violin|

@selena: I'd take boobs from next door nikki, body from princess blueyez and face from perfect paz (www.perfectpaz.com) and that would make a my dream girl. Oh wait, maybe just take boobs from next door nikki and attach them to perfect paz and it would be ideal lol :)

@Tommy: I made a gallery promoting www.princessblueyez.com and submitted under "teens". Not sure if I did good,if not, but gallery is acceptable please move it to uniforms (she's in stockings)

Gawd Dayum

That next door nikki is hott!

I built some sites with free LightSpeed content and some LL rejected it because the pics were to softcore. I think out of a 20 pic set only 3 or 4 of them have breast exposed.

I agree with you, as a guy ladies with clothing on have a lot more sexual appeal to me, right now I am making hardcore sites and Im struggling to eat my lunch.

this lass:
http://www.smithslookup.co.uk/inbedw...h/galleryb.htm

her less really is more ;-)

Yeah the right girl in the right outfit is way hotter then most girls butt naked!

I wish more LL would take non-nude softcore on their sites!

Hehe now thats what I call big tits ! Next door nikki is a small titty girl compared to her :)

Non-nude is not a problem for me at all, as long as it's not a backdoor attempt at listing underage women. Hello, no-brainer. Lingerie, softcore - most link lists have several categories appropriate for "non nude" content. Reference to "non nude" as a niche in itself seems to have a (possibly deserved) connection with CP.