Question to the LL owners
 

I follow the talk lately about poor quality vid caps content.

Well... my content is not vid caps but exclusive genuine voyeur content. In these circumstances you'll agree that the quality is not as if you're shooting in a studio with a top notch equipment.

I see some of you list me with this content but some of you don't. I asked GG on this board a year ago if he will list such sites and he said yes. But he (his reviewers) might have changed his mind.

So, LL owners please check a couple of my sites and tell me if you'll list them with this content.

http://www.erotica-blog.com/peeing-outdoors/index.html
http://www.erotica-blog.com/have-to-pee/index.html

Thanks

Decent vidcaps in the voyeur category is ok for me.

Vid caps are vide caps, no matter how you look at them - take this pic as an example:
http://www.erotica-blog.com/peeing-o.../images/20.jpg
Very bad & I no longer want to link to thise quality of content :(

No hard feeling - that's why I am asking.

This conent sells the pay site well though, retention is good and 2/3 of the site content have this kind of images in the memebrs area. So IMHO, members must love it.

Having said that it's your LL and you decide what to list and what not |santa|

Sumbit your voyeur sites here http://www.voyeureye.com/cgi-bin/links/add.cgi
Your amateur content will be listed. :)