the forbidden words
 

oke i wanna know who of here the linksites owners would list a site wich ahve the words 100% real lolitas on the banners!

I can answer for everyone - NONE

oke why i warned a guy using flashcahs banners dirty teen who has those words on still gets accepted at linksites, yeah flashcash has those banners with 100 % lreal ****** , now i wanna yell about that because we all talk alot about the young girl and all to prevend pedofiels!!! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Stuveltje...Ive never seen a FC ad with anything about 100% loli*a on it...are you sure the guys not making his own?

She's already gone to bed Linkster, but I just went through the Dirty Teen banners at FC and they didn't have any on their site with that term.

I seem to remember a very long time ago FlashCash having a site like that. Times were different back then.

Those banners are real, I've seen a few floating around recently, but they're from a long time ago and I know FC doesn't allow their use anymore...

Yeah, teenteenteen use to be called ( I think ) teen ****** or similar... when I first started out, I had a full page ad from them that had "******" in it. When I came to more clearly understand the term, it was gone.

There is always a possiblity in the many sites we have all built over the years that there could be such a banner dragging around somewhere, but it ain't intentional.

I haven't found an xpics banner since spring. :-)

Alex

Haha Alex.....Ive still got a few of those floating around

Yes - Flashcash has been walking a very thin line with their advertising... For a long time their best selling site was ****** Teens (I still have tons of these banners on old sites!) and afterwards they advertised something like "owned by an offshore company and not restricted by US laws".

morning guys and gals (night for you all) yep i have checked flashcash again, if you click the free content section, and click dirty teen you can get the free screen caps, click the first one and you have your add with the forbidden words you can use that, so i think some webmasters make also banners from it.

I declined this site 3 days ago - check the graphic on gallery 2 - it's a Flashcash site, I don't know if it's their graphic or not though.

http://www.freecumfetish.com/sexyteenpussy/warning.html

it is its a ready gallery from flashcash, btw you can pick out 3 promotion urls for dirty teen the fist one has the words too.well glad that some Linksites see the words and decline them.Wetalked alot about the young word, and the last days i get sites submitted again with the young g*rls words on banners and as an title again.but then thats why i like my delet button|bananna|

How many people get into building teen sites and then find that it's the hardest niche to make any money from?

Saturated markets are for the experts and the fools. :)

I am thinking this post said it all :)

I may be wrong but I think Mark might drop you from FC for using one of the old banners from "****** teens" on a new gallery. |sad|

I couldn't agree more urb! There is so much free teen content, there are so many teen tgp's...

And when a good new teen site comes along it gets saturated within 6-12 months.

Hardest niche for me to convert by far... Pity, cause I like the content :D

That's very true urb (Matt - lol - URA perv) :)

On the original subject though... I have a bitch about that which struck me earlier this evening!

When I search Google for 'porn' I see that 'Free ****** Porn' is ranked ahead of me (and it really pisses me off)!
So I'm wondering - and it's probably naiive of me - how is it Google are allowed to provide links to sites named using cp terms with impunity?
Is there some law that says they are allowed to be impartial?

Is it because - despite they can supposedly tell enough about a web page to niche it / rank it / understand it & calculate its incoming & outgoing link relativity - they can't tell whether its providing cp or information about the subject & related matters???
... even with a site is entitled 'free ****** porn' ???

Isn't it true that any other organisation - in any country where cp is illegal - that openly lists links to sites advertising the provision of cp would be subject to investigation and prosecution?

sorry for the ramble but I can't help feeling I must've missed something obvious - (paranoia - everybody thinks that about me) - and I can't be bothered to go search for the answer - so I thought I'd look stupid & ask out loud |scared|

Christy, if they stop listing "******", what's next? Google isn't in a position to check the legality of every site it has in it's index. It is an index, not a reviewed list of sites. I don't think they want to start filtering.

Go search for "underage porn"... 'nuff said.

I have a t-shirt from the free speech coalition: "When they get rid of god damn, how long before they get rid of god?"

Alex

Christie - I know, if I wasn't I wouldn't be in this biz ;)

And I agree with Alex, "******" was orignally a movie that many art criticie people love. I saw it and thought it sucked (besides the point really), but imagine if google started dropping terms... The SE world would turn upside down and who knows what would fall out the other end.

The reason search engines are so effective is because they are impartial, to a degree, and allow surfers to find what they want. I personally think dropping the terms would end up giving them promotion, and hence more people would be looking for the stuff :(


Matt

'Loli*a' is a name of book by Vladimir Nabokov, and they still sell that book. I can lend that book from library. There is also two movies done by that book, and at least one soundtrack CD from newer movie. Also there is at least one audio CD in this world named 'Lola, Loli*a'. I don't know what the content is, but you can buy it from Amazon.

I believe the word is used in many places that have nothing to do with porn, so Google can't ban it.

Here in Finland, at 70's, we had the rock group named 'Virtanen' (Smith in english). Their biggest hit was 'Loli*a'.

BTW, there is one celebrity whose first name is Loli*a...but what was last name?

I know it was a film & that the word ****** used to be 'acceptable' (so did 'nigger')! And of course there are anti-cp sites like asacp who necessarily use the terms on their pages... there are acceptable uses of all the words - but see where I said: "they can tell enough about a web page to niche it / rank it / understand it & calculate its incoming & outgoing link relativity - but they can't tell whether its providing cp or information about the subject & related matters??? ... even with a site is entitled 'free l0lita porn' ???" ... that's the point.

Films called L0lita are one thing, sites advertising "protection against c... p..." are ok but sites called 'free l0lita porn' and 'free underage porn' are another... and Alex - I'm sorry but if Google used that for an argument it would be a cop out & when you say "Go search for "underage porn"... 'nuff said. " don't you think that's reinforcing my point rather than answering it?

I know about freedom of speech & extremes of prejudice & civil rights & all the rest of it but anyone else who fails to filter out sites with those 'blatant terms' would be prosecuted -
So why are Google able to provide links to it?

Sorry to be dogmatic but I'm really unconvinced that it's beyond their capabilities to tell that 'free underage porn' isn't info & 'free l0lita porn' isn't about a film (& you're right - it was a crap film) - they could at least 'de-rank' those pages to pr0 - they recognise the word 'porn' slots you into adult - how can they not spot - and deal with - these others?