These people love Richards-Realm a lot!
 

Nice design, fancy colors so I had a look at the source code..
http://www.eroticnymphets.com/?datw=rls00115

Oh and prepare for a popup.

I better copy that part here..












:)

Shit, that's an AdultMasterCash site. Bastards.

Damn, and I just started promoting those fuckers. |angry|

Sorry to ask a dumb question lol, but what's wrong with the header code? Yeah I see richardsrealm and tommys in the metas but those metas are just going to get crapped on by google (though I dunno about yahoo).

The problem is that it's a pretty pathetic attempt to get hits from people searching for Richard's site. Most people would consider it cheating.

and a very amateurish attempt too... I would never promote a sponsor doing that type of shit... it shows they don't know what they are doing

Wow,

Glad I never started sending traffic to them. Thanks for the heads up.

adult master cash
adultmaster cash
adult mastercash
adultmastercash

:D

LOL you think they would have been here by now...

You would think...

maybe they have to fix some html "errors" by an employee that did it "without permission" first :D

Guys, Ladies.

It is quite simple in fact. This site has joined to our program some time ago. Of course we have not even looked in it's keywords and meta-tegs besides legality of them. This site is near a year with us and if you think we are willingly used these wordings on the single site while did not use them on others - it is a logical nonsence to me.
Actually, I think it would be ridiculous to use this wording hoping to make "mega bucks" with it :) And I am quite sure any webmaster who worked with us a while would not name us stupid. So there are two possible reasons of this incident:
1. We have gone crazy and decided to ruine all the reputation we've got for 3,5 years of business making idiotic additions to our sites metategs. Is it the case? I really don't think so :)
2. We've got these words with the site. I do not know who have added them - site owners, designer, unknown jocker... I can't help you with identifying this person sorry :) However, I am agree with you that keeping these words on site would be simply nonsence. We've removed them and soon this site will be modified to fit our multidesign feature and all keywords will be completely rebuilded to better reflect site's containment. This is all we can do in this situation - I am really doubt we have to prove we did not intended to get all WorldSex or RichardsRealm traffic using these metategs :)

I am sorry to everyone who was offended by this incident. To be honest, I think it is funny enough to just smile. But if anyone feels offended - I am really sorry. I will be more careful with details next time we invite foreign site to our program (if ever).

Peace.

well it's nice that you think it is funny, but basically you have no control over the sites in your program? that have been there for over a year? and if you looked to see the "legality" of your metas you would have seen that infringing on trademarked names is "illegal"

Of course we have control over the sites. But legality checking was made providing no words from particular list are contained in metategs. I have not read these metategs - basically because I would not think they may be used this way. And of course I would not think we should check them for all available trademarks besides illegal wording list :) It was quite surprisingly to me people can even think this would work.

Anyway, these words are removed now. I really do not know who have placed them there - and to be honest I do not think this means anything now. I brought my apologies to anyone who has been offended by it. Although I would not been offended if anyone would use our program name in their metategs I understand others may be.
Again: I am sorry.

Should I burn my hairs and post my bold head photo here to show I am sorry? :)

New from AdultMasterCash........

Psychic Webmastering

Learn how to edit and change a page without looking at it.....

http://www.eroticnymphets.com/ - today
http://web.archive.org/web/200401010...cnymphets.com/ - >1 yr ago

|frankie

This is the offensive part.

:D LOL well they did post that it has been changed as of today, but I have psychic powers if you read my previous posts in this thread regarding the blame game

So you bought a site, threw it online & never bothered to check what was in the html coding. Not too fucking bright if you ask me.

BTW - you still have "netverifier" in your metas - wanna explain how that slipped thru?

Oh, please. What are you trying to say? I admitted these metategs had been there - I didn't try to say that they had not. We just removed them immediately when one of our webmasters pointed me to this topic and I paid attention to eroticnymphets metategs.

To all people who could been misleaded with easy tone of my previous posts:
Yes we have fucked up with these metategs. We SHOULD have noticed and removed them earlier. We didn't, and I am very much ashamed and all our team as well.
No, we did not willingly place these metategs to this site - they were there before this site had joined our program.
Yes once I have been awared of this bug it has been fixed immediately.
I admit that it was our mistake. I am not trying to evade any responsibility. However, I really do not understand what are we supposed to do now (to your mind). All people who think that they have suffered from this incident are welcome to contact us and we are ready to discuss financial compensation if needed :)

It is definitely our mistake. No doubt. So what?
It was one little mistake for 3,5 years. All I can say about it - shit happens. It alway happens sooner or later when two or more people work on same things independently. It was really a little shit and I suppose we've got enough experience to not allow same things happen in future. That's all I can say about it since I consider this problem resolved (those who have financial claims to us because of this incident are welcome to contact us as I have mentioned earlier).

You have reviewers you are sure competent enough to complete relatively simple work. Do you think it would be wise to follow each of them and check everything they do?
It was simple tech procedure to include the site. We have used all the necessary standard procedures to ensure everything is fine. We didn't have any reasons to check if page contains words like worldsex or richards-realm - as this had never happen before.
And our tech specialists of course have not been supposed to detect this bug because it was not of technical nature.

It is just an accident. Unpleasant accident of course but we just had no way to foresee it - because it is absurdical to make such things. Just like you would not ever check
words Queen of England on free sites submitted to you (for example).

Grrrrmmm. I'll kill this guy who have edited the site. He seems to remove only
words, mentioned in the thread as wrong. I am going to make him switch his brain on now.
I'm really sorry about him. It is really nasty mistake after all :(

An accident is "woops, I dropped my coffee"... you don't accidentally ADD about 100 very specific words to your meta tags. "Oops, I typed Richards Realm twice"...

Come off it.

Your guy attempted to steal traffic from others be misleading SEs. When faced with it, he only removed a very small part of the problem.

Sad.

Alex

I'm giving up. We steal traffic from worldsex and richards-realm, then trying to "escape" when catched out. And Hun or any other big TGP/Linklist are trying to steal money from sponsors every time they list gallery using stolen content - and trying to "escape" by deleting it from listing when it is discovered.
Get real. We had no reasons for such a stupid speculations. No reasons ever - just pure pragmatism tells that most optimistic income from such an idiotic action would not overcome a threat of appearing in a thread like this.
It is up to you to believe us or not. I'm not going to argue any more. Just follow your common sence - ask yourself would you risk 3,5 years business for possible few thousands hits and if not ask yourself again why do you consider people to be more stupid than you.

edit: Ups, sorry - I just noticed you typed "your guy" not "you guys". What can I say - I can just repeat that it was foreign site which we have invited to our program about a year ago (15 jan 2004 if I remember all correct). Our fault was that we have not noticed these words, not adding them cause they already existed when site appeared in our program - and I have described all the reasons why we did not noticed them earlier. We've got the site with those words already and I think about the guy who has added them that he is an idiot. Only idiot would do such a thing.
Our fault is that we were not attentive enough - and I admit it in full. However, I barely can imagine what can we do now to undo all the time these words were on site.
So I can't understand what do you want from us now - can anyone say it exactly?

also



|pokefun|

the point is that the site is in your program and it was/is doing complete bullshit which gives your whole program a BAD NAME... if you aren't responsible (and see my previous post for that excuse) then you need to police your program a bit more.... I don't care if you are in business for 3,5 years 3.5 years or 35 years.... it doesn't really matter if you stole 1 hit or 100,000 hits it is stil 100% wrong to do especially when you are a SPONSOR, and the "we didn't know but now it is fixed" excuse has been used too many times