2257 And SHG/SHFS
 

2257 dosent apply if you just link to sponsor hosted materials does it?
I wouldnt think so.

If you cause the image to appear on YOUR domain then it does.

If it's a hyperlink to THEIR page then it doesnt.

IMHO. Not a lawyer.

Frames are a nice technical issue they may have overlooked in their regs. A framed image is still technically on the other domain, software just pulls the two together.

Just link to them with a text link and you're peaches swimming in cream.

tickler, sorry, frames mean it's published on your domain (just like a magazine accepting a pre-made page from someone else... it doesn't negate the responsiblity). For a layperson standing on the outside, the images would appear to be on your domain, and that is enough for me :)

SERIOUSLY: Don't use tricks or "sneaky" ways to try to get around this. Face it head on.

Alex

Ok, I will wait and see |bow| what the final results are first.

Anybody know if I can put
republicans-for-bush.com
in the address bar. |devil|

Only if the girls don't shave.

Alex

Alex, your recent messages have been filled with opinions, and a bit of advice. I'm curious as to exactly on what they're based. You're in Montreal, correct? Have you consulted with a US attorney? You make comments about US "laws" that are news to me. I'd love to know your source.

if i use an link in a frame i dont see it that i have the content on my domain because i havent , 2 ways to check the source on that domain: right click on the site and view source, you see the source of the page i have up, but top screen and view source you see the real source, i have only a link there, i have alot of that stuff that way....example http://www.sexstoryhome.com/Pussy/
http://www.big-boob-planet.com/ check in both ways the content is not hosted on my domain, so i would say not hosted on my domain i dont need the 2257.....maybe i am stubburn.but then whats new :D

Please calirfy:

If they don't shave their pussy, thier underarms, their legs, of if they are a sponsor and don't save joins?