![]() |
Clarification
This may be a dumb ?
So under the new 2257 if the site I build is only nude female stripping is 2257 needed on the actual free site? No hardcore or penetration at all. |
It depends on which lawyer you ask. |huh
|
|pokefun|
Quote:
|
It really depends on what the DOJ's definition of "sexually explicit" is (which no one knows)
|
Well,shit biscuits and country fried fuck this is aggrevating!!!!
|
Quote:
I think, instead telling people to consult an attorney, we should be telling them to consult several attorneys and their attorneys' attorneys. Me thinks it would be a lot cheaper and just as accurate to sit down for 15 minutes with a palm reader or a proctologist. |
It is one of the weird things about the new 2257 that doesn't make sense. There is a definition of sexual explicit in 2256 that is the "standard". But then in the new 2257 they exclude "E" (genitals) but keep using the term sexually explicit - which as a matter of law has been defined in 2256.
It's stunning how it all goes. Alex |
Well, they say SM/BD is sexually explicit lol :D so who the fuck knows most SM people i know are clothed and it has nothing to do with sex WTF do they even know what it is?? What's next sex stories too :D i'm tired of 2257 already, can't do shit til someone actually knows what is going on it's getting fustrating!
|
Sec. 2256. - Definitions for chapter
(2) ''sexually explicit conduct'' means actual or simulated - (A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; (B) bestiality; (C) masturbation; (D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person; So I wonder if simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals means that you need docs for a fully dressed model spreading her legs... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc