Rejected at free porn post
 

Sorry...

Your submission:

Blonde-Brunette Anal
http://www.worldofanalsex.com/freesi...runette_anal7/

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Please carefully read the rejection reason stated below. I've tried to make these reasons quite clear. If you still have questions, feel free to e-mail me and I'll do my best to clarify.

Reason:
Sorry, I don't list sites of this nature.


Sorry, but I don't get it...what nature? It's an anal site and you have anal category...

Hey there Pendo...

This is one of those personal preference things. As noted on my rules page, I don't list sites that are unfriendly to women. I've always thought of sex as a good thing...a very good thing :D I try to impart that focus of pleasure into my link site.

When you're promoting a site called Anal Suffering and using text like;

'Destroyed By Huge Cocks' and 'Riped Apart By Huge American Cocks'

That doesn't sound like much fun for the woman anymore. I know these kinds of sites must sell or they wouldn't be out there. But, mysogynistic sites specifically about inflicting pain on women isn't something I'll list.

Besides, anal sex does NOT have to be painful if done properly and respectfully to the woman...it can be about great pleasure for both parties :D

So yes, I do have an anal categorry...but I won't touch sites that focus on inflicting so much pain she can't walk for a week |angry|

Hope that clears it up |thumb

ok, I get it...but that is what's anal about...people love when huge cock is going in that tight asshole and "destroys" it...

Ummm...ok...definitely an opinions vary kinda thing. Too bad for any girl that ever decides to try anal with you...huh?

But, back to the point at hand...

I promote anal sites too...and do so without using text like...'anal ripping' or 'It hurts? So What!'(from your site yesterday). Anal sites do convert just fine without going to the brutal mysogynistic side of anal.

No need to get into an anal debate here :D

Suffice it to say, I don't list those kinds of sites. If that's your opinion of anal and how you choose to promote it, your choice. Just as it's my choice not to list those kinds of sites.

Only thing I would add is that mysogynistic attitude certainly doesn't do our business any good when being looked at by outsiders...again, just my opinion :)

its all personal thing here, others will list it and some others dont, dont nag just go one, have respect for the linksites who dont wanna list it and their reason, i did alot of anal sites and i do respect how linksites think, if they dont like it, oke i move on:)))

hmmm, maybe you changed the site Pendo, but it looks good to me, except the pics are not of the same series.

Those text links don't bother me too much. I'd just try to stay away from any "one-sided" pain. Meaning, if the guy is piercing the chick, fucking her butt, sticking a baseball bat inside her without her consent, that's a bit too far, but if she asks for it and wants it, its' all good. And, I'd say those chicks at your sponsor look like they are enjoying a fat cock up their butt, anyway!

Hi Stu |waves|

I see by my mail boxes that you're getting caught up :D

Valid point Ponyman. IF the girls is having fun, it's all good |thumb

Honestly, I didn't even make it to check out the sponsor or his pics on the site in question. Been seeing more and more of these anal sites talking about 'anal tearing' and 'tissue ripping' and 'who cares if it hurts bitch'. Pendo's site certainly wasn't the worst I've seen by far.

In re-reading my last message... perhaps I crashed on Pendo a bit hard. If so, my apologies Pendo...no offense intended |shake|

As Stu mentioned, we're all entitled to our opinions :)

It's just that I'm promoting sponsor that has that kind of anal site...I didn't said I like that. anyway...Apologie accepted |shake|

Understood Pendo :)

Excellent, glad you accepted |thumb