content question
 

Hi LL guys,

I`m not sure by that but is it possible that so called "young-old" content even of high quality hardly get listed?


Your thoughts please...

What's 'young-old' content?

If you mean the Mature moms and young boys content then yes - I won't list that stuff because the boys seem to be underage both by their looks and by the text on sponsor/ free site pages.

No I don't list mommy doing the little boy up the street. :(

ok ok lets make an example :)

http://www.hotmaturexxx.com/rbmature.../gallery2.html

I dont know but this guy could be nice 22 or so... I think he`s not under 18.

Some LL owners don't like the wallpaper that's used in these sets |couch|

I would list that - The guy is old enough - you can see that. I think Cleo and ynuahayt are getting at the blatent mommy doing a 12 year old shit that is floating about.

This kind of thing IMO is touch and go, if YOU would think they might be too young and might get rejected - you will probably run into a problem somewhere down the line.

Does this mom cum little boy stuff really convert anyway?

It's not the age of the guy, it's the style and promotion of the paysite that gets most Link List owners. At first those sites had nothing but Mom doing Delivery Boy, Boy gets lucky with Mom, ect. The paysites where pushing the BOY thing. Didn't matter what age the guy is if the paysite inplies something different.

I see most of the new sites (built by these russians) have changed their advertising approach.