Is this good enough to get listed?
 

I am just curious, I have not had alot of success in getting listed on link lists. I have been doing galleries since 1997 and have done well, but the success in this has been decreasing. I recently submitted this free site to link lists and am just curious if this is one that has a high probability of getting listed on Link Lists.

Here is the site:
http://www.lostbush.com/babemovies/index.html

Thank you

Hey ammo325,

nice looking babe, but I think the images should be 640 x 480 and also the ENTER link on the bottom of the galleries will irritate your surfers. IMHO it's a blind link and link lists dont like it.

Just my 2 eurocents

Your site looks nice for me, I would list it ;)

I like this design |thumb

Hi ammo325

You should note which are movies and which are pics.

You don't need the 2257 link on every page. You don't even need it linked.

As RobertK said some if not most reviewers would consider those enter buttons on the galleries as blind.


I like your layout other than that :)

Howdy |waves|

Here goes my loving appraisel:
Index page:
-What's the title? The Bushman's Babe Movies? If so, it should be in the title bar of the browser as well.
-The graphics above the recips pretty much amounts to an FPA.
-"So fresh you can almost smell it" is a blind link.
-You 2257 link opens a new window.

Main page:
-The two text links are blind. No destination is mentioned.
Galleries:
- As you know now, the Enter graphic and text links are blind. Never use the word enter on any link except the free site's own entrance.
- I don't like the fact that there is nothing telling which is a movie and which is a jpg. I was surprised when the first movie opened.

Overall, it's a very nice effort. It's not listable, but it won't take much more than a few minutes time to make the repairs necessary to get listed.

I've always thought that the mixing of pics & vids was silly - I have a movies category but I wouldn't list this site in there.

Your images are technically ok with my link list, but they are just at the minimum.

2257 links are ok in my book (as well as most others)

;) I just want to make sure that everyone realizes that I agree, 2257 links are fine with me. I was only faulting the fact that the 2257 links in question open a second browser window when clicked. Most of link lists will not count 2257 links against you, assuming you have no additional ad links on your 2257 page. In fact, a few lists demand a 2257 link.

Yes, I'm paranoid. |shocking|

Looks like the others have already given you solid advice |thumb

I'd add that your 'See My Boobies Click Now' link is pretty blind too.

And I don't think you'll want to use the paysite name in your title tag.

And yea, definitely label the difference between pics and vids. Or create a gallery of each...very strange having em mixed like they are now. I'm with Greenie...one or the other, but not both on the same site.

That said, I have been known to offer one or two sample vids on a pictures site. But, always clearly labeled that they're sample vids. And just one or two to entice the surfer further :D

Nice clean design...just needs a few tweaks to make the grade |thumb

Useless - I didn't see your post before I replied :)

2257 links that lead to legit 2257 pages & don't break any other rules (new windows) are ok in my book & are not counted against you as far as the ads per page rule.

I don't see tons of blind links on this site, but this is just my own opinion ;) For me it's a very nice teen site ;) I'm sure surfers will like this site too |thumb

Thanks for all the constructive critisism. It seems like I am on the right track. That helps me alot. I will change the things that you all suggested and give it another try at submission.

This helps me to understand what type of templates I need to work on.

|headbang|

New windows SUCK full stop


Unless informed

I wouldnt list it or even come close to even giving it a second look - I dont list free sites using hosted gallery templates as the gallery pages - go back and make your own pages

I know, Yahook, we are all unreasonable and you will list anything. You should just put that in your sig.


ammo325: The site has potential, but you definitely have some work to do. The comments have pretty well been covered above, I'll just add that you need to keep the paysite name from looking like the title of your site (i.e. the header)

ammo325,
have a look at this article I found some times ago:
http://www.hqpornlinks.com/webmasters/articles/LL.htm

It gives you a little deeper insight into a reviewers thoughts.

Isn't that Yahook's article?

Yes it is - which brings up the question of - why the fuck did we just have a whole long thread about recips if you already knew the answers??
I remember that page from a long time ago so its not something brand new

Linkster, I do appreciate your cander. Before you bash me though, I do design my own templates. This particular template however was one the designer gave me prior to it becoming a Sponsor gallery.

I have been creating galleries since 97. I did many of the original gallery templates for Lightspeed that he now uses for sponsor hosted galleries.

I can assure though that normally I do design my own. I have a whole slew of them. This just happens to be one that ended up being a Sponsor gallery.

Thanks

It's not true :) But my policy is very friendly for linklist submitters.

I want to write a new article, but I don't have time to do it now :(

Submit your stuff to our guy at Shag At Sea and you'll likely get listed pretty quick.