Instro :: FreeSite Review Needed
 

Hey guys im looking fo some comments on this FS, before i submit it to LL's - Thanks

A. http://www.imaddictedtoo.net/gay/2/
B. Royal Spa Treatment
C. See How Ordinary Men Are Seduce Into Having Their First Facial
D. Gay

looks ok, you followed most general rules of LLs, it's clean, I guess it should be accepted by LLs

Nicely done actually instro....if this is your first one, Im impressed. I don't see any problems with most LL's and if so, I know we'd approve it at ours.

Nice work on the keyword Enter button and the gallery links too.

Nice site, clean smooth, logical. Colors may be a little subdued for "grab ya" effect but its visually and technically good!

instro, there are 2 things that are going to get you declined instantly - your whois info & the galleries both have a horizontal scroll at 800px. The whois would have to be changed before you can do much submitting.

not that I have a gay cat anyway lol :)

Ponygirl

For a first attempt your site looks very good. But watch out for Blind Links - on your first 2 pages there's a number of links which don't mention the sponsor. A lot of LL's will reject the site for this.

Already submitted ... just waiting on approval


Thanks for the FYI - horizontal scroll fixed

I perfer that my personal information that show up on the whois

Blind Links? ... Where?

Thanks for the submission :) I will check the submissions once I finish restoring all my computer files, programs, etc...(long process) because I had to reformat...joy.

instro
No blind links! Either you've changed it or I was having a serious senior moment when I looked before.

Just created a new one ...

A. http://www.imaddictedtoo.net/toys/wildmachines/
B. Wild Party Machines
C. Watch As Beautiful Women Get Pounded By Machine-Mounted Dildos
D. Toys/Fetish

Looks alright. I'd see if you could drop the text above that box ad on your main page so there isn't a space between the text and the graphic, some might consider the text is by itself and count it blind. I probably wouldn't.

But I think you need to calm down a tad on your keywords:


I don't think that helps you more then it hurts you.

-Preacher

You should check out:
http://www.sitesolutions.com/analysis.asp?F=Form

Thanks for the comment ... But damn only one!!!

Kinda rude to someone who's trying to HELP you |loony|

Just as an fyi...those online services are largely useless and can indeed bite you in the ass. As a reviewer myself, I will decline sites that overly spam in their metas as I don't want to be linked to them when the se spiders come around.

Other than the metas, your fuck machines sites looks pretty good |thumb

However, as Ponygirl mentioned earlier in this thread...protected whois is going to give you problems getting listed at a lot of sites. Yes, I did see your response...but to be blunt, if you're that concerned about privacy...perhaps you might want to rethink being involved in the adult industry. This is a business and many of us want to know who we're doing business with when listing sites. Protected whois info will not fly with most of the larger lists.

Alot of newbies like to shoot themselves in the foot when it comes to meta keyword tags. |huh

I guess you're assuming "You are using your keywords effectively" and "You are not spamming your keywords, they will be accepted by the search engines" because that tool told you so.

Google don't care much about meta keyword. Title and content text is important.