Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   General Business Knowledge (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   State of Michigan sends out "anti-spam" letter (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=29526)

RawAlex 2006-03-03 02:32 PM

State of Michigan sends out "anti-spam" letter
 
I have a sense of humor about politicians run amock, but this one pretty much sizzles my bacon.

http://www.monolithnet.com/michigan/michcover.jpg

and then

http://www.monolithnet.com/michigan/michletter.jpg


What the fuck are these people thinking? I am sorry, but the only people who are on any mailing list I own are double opt-in (confirmed box) people who have asked to get my mailings (which I have not sent out more than a couple of times in a year). I don't spam, I don't send UCE, etc.

Who the fuck do they think they are sending me a warning? How do they think that they can impose state US law on a Canadian in Canada?

Anyone have a clue what these fuckheads are up to?

Alex

glowlite 2006-03-03 02:46 PM

Was it specifially addressed to you and/or your business name?

RawAlex 2006-03-03 03:11 PM

Yes, the envelope was specifically addressed to me / my business name.

Alex

glowlite 2006-03-03 03:39 PM

I briefly went through their Protection Registry Act and it reaches back to 2004. It compares somewhat to the Do Not Call list. If the "crime" is commited in Michigan it doesn't matter where you live or where your biz is domiciled.

I'd say purge your data base of MI addresses so as to never be bothered with it. Or resend an opt-in to MI addresses if they have any $$$ marketing value.

RawAlex 2006-03-03 03:52 PM

glowlite, there is no easy way to tell what is an MI address. Example, users from MI using AOL, or people who opted in while living in ohio who moved to MI, etc.

For these reasons, MI is attempting to regulate international business AT MY EXPENSE (at 7/10 of a cent per address, I would be looking at thousands of dollars to check existing clients, and an ongoing expense moving forward - for clients who have to comfirm opt in to get any mails (which I send VERY rarely if ever). I would have to check all user email addresses from all over the world because there is no simple way to determine if the user CURRENTLY is in MI.

It isn't anywhere near as easy as you might think.

Alex

Loganp8000 2006-03-03 03:54 PM

Cant wait
 
US thinks they can police the whole world. Makes me Ill. I would be pissed if I had an opt-in list, lived in Canada, and got that piece of mail. Send them a formal letter back, telling them your 100% legit and to leave you alone or face harrasment charges!

ALOHA

MrYum 2006-03-03 04:16 PM

Damn, wish I had some good advice for ya Alex |huh

That DOES suck wind big time |angry|

RawAlex 2006-03-03 04:30 PM

The contents inside the envelope were not personally addressed (I posted everything that was in the envelope) but it was personally addresses (computer label) on the outside.

My feeling is that someone might have used one of my (numerous) domains on a joejob, and rather than doing a little detective work, the minions just mail shit out the door like that.

Alex

Maj. Stress 2006-03-03 06:56 PM

Raw Alex,
Letters like that make good trash can filler.

quest 2006-03-03 09:39 PM

Wow Alex,
What can anyone say except my state certainly sucks... |huh

I did get the following from the ACLU site though:
Quote:

The ACLU has brought other successful challenges to state "harmful-to-minors" laws in Michigan, New Mexico, New York, Arizona and Vermont. A case brought in Virginia also resulted in a "harmful-to-minors" law being struck down. The ACLU noted that the state challenges were successful because of the impossibility of verifying the age as well as location of Internet users, as the law requires.
Not sure what those "successful challenges" were though.

Doesn't seem such a thing could ever hold up in court,
More than likely there looking for money as Jennifer [the Governor]
has pretty much broke the state.

Here is an online ACLU Michigan complaint form:
http://www.aclumich.org/modules.php?name=Complaint_Form


Ben

spacemanspiff 2006-03-04 01:51 PM

Seems to me that if they really wanted to protect those email addresses from UCE they would make their database available for download for free. It wouldn't be that hard to come up with a script to compare the databases. Hell, I think I could do it, and I can't code my way out of a wet paper bag.

MonsterPartners 2006-03-04 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacemanspiff
Seems to me that if they really wanted to protect those email addresses from UCE they would make their database available for download for free. It wouldn't be that hard to come up with a script to compare the databases. Hell, I think I could do it, and I can't code my way out of a wet paper bag.

Exactly, if protection was so important, databases should be free. Instead they charge what could amount to very large sums of money. Just another government money grab

RawAlex 2006-03-04 10:45 PM

It is a money grab alright, because to remain "compliant" you would have to check each and every email address every time you use it to see if the name has been added to the "do not send list". An AOL member could move from one state to another and bang, you could be in violation even through you previously checked. Someone could add their name, and you would not get notification... you would have to query every address again to see if any new ones would get in there.

I would be looking at thousands of dollars every time I send a mailing to a complete, double opt-in real confirmed list.

It is total bullshit.

Alex

MadMax 2006-03-05 11:48 PM

Yet another reason I hate our Governor. I hated that bitch when she was a Wayne County prosecutor making shady back-room deals for the city of Detroit, I hated her when she was state attorney general and her husband was getting mega-million dollar no-bid contracts and not delivering on them, and I especially hate her now that she's governor, presiding over one of the worst periods in history for Michigan's economy and just making the situation worse.

This is nothing more than yet another money grab from the office of a skank who can't balance a budget and comes up with some of the most assinine plans imaginable to extort money from people.

A couple years ago she managed to get records from a bunch of internet cigarette sales companies and sent out tens of millions of dollars in tax bills to unsuspecting taxpayers for "back taxes" on the smokes they'd bought online. People lost their houses over that fiasco.

In case I haven't been clear, I FUCKING HATE JENNIFER GRANHOLM AND ANYONE DUMB ENOUGH TO SUPPORT HER, AND I WISH CANADA WOULD REPOSSESS HER SORRY ASS.

Alex, can you see if anyone in your government would be interested in forcibly removing her from the Governor's office? She IS Canadian after all. Maybe there's some arcane passage in NAFTA that will help. It would help solve your current problem and one of my long term problems ;)

Dr Bizzaro 2006-03-07 07:08 AM

I got that letter in the mail. I couldnt figure out why the fuck they sent it to me.

Wazza 2006-03-07 07:15 AM

I too received one today - which is truly weird because I've never sent one commercial email to anyone.

I'd say it's possible that they've run through every adult whois and fired one off to all of us. Or they've cocked up and assumed that I was the one doing the sending when some fuck monkey has used one of my doms as the fake sender of spam emails.

But, as Alex says, they can take their fee and cram it fairly and squarely where the sun don't shine... I'm not complying with American laws until you liberate us by bombing us back into the 3rd world...

Simon 2006-03-07 07:35 AM

We got one too.

Max, I have to agree, your governor is trying her hand at the extortion racket. And doesn't even have the sense to package it in a way that would make her victims willing to pay the tariff.

This doesn't give me anywhere near the concerns that Yahoo and AOL moving to charging for delivering email does. We have a double opt-in newsletter list, pretty good size, and those two represent nearly 40% of the addresses on the list.

Toolz 2006-03-07 09:25 AM

Simon,

Would that be a great thing though if Yahoo and AOL paid to charge for delivery? Seems to me this would just be guaranteed delivery and so long as you had a compliant list and were following Can-Spam people would be all for it.

RawAlex 2006-03-07 10:28 AM

Toolz, the problem is cost...

Let's say they want 1 cent per email... that is pretty low.

Let's say your email click out rate is 1%, which would be pretty high.

You have a site that converts 1 in 200 on your mailer traffic.

100* 200 * 0.01 = $200 costs per sale. In order to get that down to "break even" for most operators, the cost from aol would have to be in the range of 1/10 of a cent per mail - otherwise the cost price of doing business would make it impossible.

Alex

RawAlex 2006-03-07 10:34 AM

Let me add to this for a minute...

let's say each state has a do-not-send list that must be consulted before every mailing. Let's say that the US feds also have a list. Combined it costs 3 cents per mailing to check addresses in all these different places to make sure that nobody has added themselves onto the list since you last mailed.

Now you are sitting at 4 cents per mail, of a whopping $800 cost per sale.

"do not spam" lists are the zoning laws of the internet. They attempt to limit free speech not by banning the speech, but instead by making it almost impossible to comply with non-related regulations.

Even if it adds only 1 cent to your mailing (2 cents total) you are looking at a net cost of $400 per sale.

Nobody but nobody will mail completely legally and make money.

Alex


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc