![]() |
Dash vs Underline
I know this has been talked about in another post but I can't find it. For sites with more than one word, which is better to seperater the words, a dash - or an underline _?
|
i heard that google reads a dash (-) like a space, so it's better to use a dash.
|
Quote:
|thumb |
Well crap, the last 10 sites I built I used underlines |cry| |banghead|
|
Underline is not intended to separate words
|
Underscores work better when you're sending URL's through email. Sometimes a url with dashes gets cut off:
> domain.com/this-url-with-dashes > no-longer-works/index.html Also, consider this: domain.com/series-of-words-using-dashes-reads-choppy/index.html vs. domain.com/series_of_words_using_underscore_reads_easier/index.html When it comes to SEO, url structure seems to have such a small impact compared to so many other things I wouldn't worry about it. However, if someone uses the url string as the anchor text, dashes are more SEO friendly: domain.com/each-word-is-read-seperately/index.html domain.com/all_one_word/index.html |
Quote:
|
Google engineers are geeks (surprise, surprise). They care about searches like "HTTP_EQUIV", "_SERVER", "DOCUMENT_ROOT."
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Lets put this to rest - here's exactly how Google looks at dashs vs underscores - written by their rep:
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/ Note that they treat word1_word2 differently than word1-word2 in order for a search to show for the first example the searcher would have to type in the whole phrase wheras the second example Google treats as two separate words |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc