Using rel ="nofollow" on sponsor links ?
 

Using rel ="nofollow" on sponsor links on freesites ?
Is it a good idea ?
It should (very slightly) increase PR given back to LLs.
And sponsors pay for clicks and conversions not for PR.

What do you think ?

Never thought about that, thanks for the idea :)

I'm doing it, and my sponsor doesn't seems to mind.

I would personally use rel="nofollow" on any link that goes to a sponsor unless of course there paying you for advertising. Otherwise your just wasting your pr.

Guys(and gals) come on....!

No one ever got rich and successful off "no follow" links....
Apply your time sensibly... following so called SEO theories just sucks up your valuable time.

I would never use 'nofollow' links on a free site/avs site/gallerys etc

See note here - http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...d=1#post327163


DD

_______________________________
No Nats - Find programs that DON'T use NATS
Old Dollars - Selling older women via CCBill for longer than NATS has been around

I do not use nofollow on my free sites, I only use it on the hub (my site root)

OK i understand , but what if all freesite/gallery makers started to do it ?
You know - "power of numbers".
I think if 50000 freesites would give their LLs just 5% more PR that would possibly boost LLs PR by 1 point and this would be a good thing for everyone in the "network of links" IMHO.