Greenguy's Board - search engines and folders

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)

- Search Engines (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=13)

- - search engines and folders (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=40251)

search engines and folders

Looking for opinions on how deep to really go structuring folders for the search engines. Does it really do any good to lets say structure folders with different keywords, example:
is it better to use the following: ps: these urls do not exist, LOL

http://bigtitgirls.net/big-tits/blon...ers/index.html
versus
http://bigtitgirls.net/big-tits-blon...ers/index.html

Quote:

Does it really do any good

It'll help you rank for keywords that pull 1 hit a month.

Quote:

these urls do not exist, LOL

Then I suggest breaking up the urls or wrapping them in quotes.

I need to make myself clearer:
is it better for search engines to have most of your free site urls 1 folder deep as:

"domain.com/big-tits-blonde-sucking-hard-little-cock/index.html"

versus having them 2 folders deep:

"domain.com/big-tits/blondes/sucking-hard-little-cock/index.html"

any opinions appreciated

Quote:

I need to make myself clearer: is it better for search engines to have most of your free site urls 1 folder deep as:

You were clear enough the first time.

It doesn't matter, unless you're going apeshit stuffing your url with millions of keywords, then you'll probably trip a flag.

In general, folder depth does not matter.

Here it is straight from Google:

Quote:

typically the depth of the directory doesn’t make any difference for us; PageRank is a much larger factor. So without knowing your site, I’d look at trying to make sure that your site is using your PageRank well. A tree structure with a certain fanout at each level is usually a good way of doing it.

To Google, 99% of on-page optimizations have 1% of boosting ranking and 99% chance of hurting you.

If you want higher rankings, you hunt links.

P.S. Thanks for using quotes :)