Is this OK?
 

Is this OK to use as header / title on a free site? Of course it is a free site promoting Cum Hungry Pornstars. :)
Header

It is a header from one of the hosted galleries and I added the title.

I don't have a problem with it as long as it isn't linked.

Thanks Cleo, no links just as a title header :)

I'd like to see it on a site, but my 1st feeling is that it'd be ok.

BTW, you may want to add greenguysboard.com to your htaccess if you are going to post links to pics on your domain. I had to hit return in order to send a no referral request since clicking on it gives a forbidden error.

Can I ask why it wouldn't be ok (serious question) - is it because its too graphic?

I haven't built many free sites

Thanks Greenie, here is the site: http://www.tekporn.com/free/sexy-coc...resley-blowjob

What do you think?

OK, How do I do that? I mean what is the code to add?

The reason I was asking is because it uses a modified pay site banner with the pay site name on it. (Cum Hungry Pornstars is a pay site)

Thanks TekAngel

I thought you had some kind of htaccess file on your domain

I just looked again, but there is no htaccess file.
Anyway, I do have a htaccess file on other domains, how do I add greenguysboard.com to that?

I can't see it in Firefox, but I can in IE.

BTW - unlinked, it's perfectly fine with me.

In Safari I had to hit return in order to send a no referral request since clicking on it gave me a forbidden error.

Could be there's some kind of hotlinking protection enabled by the host. Colo-cation has it standard on their static virtual accounts if I'm not mistaken.

|thumb

Looks fine (I do find the pic disgusting though :D)

:D Thanks!

I use paysite headers in freesites on occasion, always unlinked and I've never had any problems.

In fact I think more people should use Cum Hungry Pornstar headers. |couch|

I didn't like that one you made based on two girls, one cup. |barf|

I gots me some new ideas for headers based on this thread...:D

That's ok with me. A little graphic maybe but I’m beginning to see a lot of FS coming in that have obvious hardcore pictures on the index page. I personally am not keen on this as the index is supposed to give the surfer a warning that tells them if they continue further, they will see porn.

What's the point of a warning on the index if you see porn as soon as you view the index page?

My finger is hovering over the reject button for these but I’d like to hear what other people think about this and whether your getting the same sort of FS submits.

That is fine with me TekAngel!

Great banners Preacher I don't find them disgusting at all quite the opposite |thumb

Bluebrit I don't reject sites because of hardcore on the warning page. I didn't realize some LL's do it either. It does make sense what you wrote though as it is a warning page.

I do get a lot of fs submits with this and I also make them with hardcore on the warning page. Haven't run into a problem so far.

I declined that site TekAngel.

Oh wait, you were approved :D

Why is it ok unlinked , but not linked?

Cum Hungry Slut
 

Whats the point of rejecting a fs for hardcore on the warning page , If they came from a LL they were already exposed to a warning page and should be expecting porn. If they came to the fs via a search query they were looking for porn as well?