Ban this sick *&%
 

I don't even believe this was submitted to me!!! |angry|

http-//www.funsgalleries.com/tgp/01/charly132.html
(URL deliberately obscured)

Reported for what it's worth |pissed|

DD

That shit really pisses me off. Sick bastard |raygun|

Sick. This is what makes this biz look bad... becasuse of motherf****rs like this!

It just loaded for me, some very sick shit. :(

WTF, VEROTEL is processing for them.

|raygun|

Administrative Contact:
Reese, Kevin gorozz@cheerful.com
2792 Northwood Ave.
Topeka, KS 66601
US
913-772-2354

If it's what I think it is, you're right to obscure the link. Can this person be reported? If it's CP the fuck deserves jailtime (and worse).

not looking, what is it.

(don't show me, just tell me)

It is a very young female that should be in school and not having some sick fuck put her on the web. :(

Someone report this bastard! I don't give a shit about him making webmasters look bad. I've got two kids myself. These shitheads ruin lives. I'd report him myself but I don't know how.

Done kristian.. http://www.asacp.com/reportsite.html

Unfortunately these low lifes "bend" the laws and may actually not be illegal..

Doesn't change what it is IMO |angry|

DD

Nice one DD . . . and I'll remember the asacp link for the future (tho I hope I wont have to use it).

I didn't look at the link (that stuff and rape, IMO, are worse than murder...they kill slow), but I hope he/they don't get away with it.

DD, you are correct, he is a sick fuck.

You are also correct, however, that this is probably legal. However, Visa did rule that IPSPs cannot process for "model" sites like this, so verotel is certainly running on the knife's edge.

The main page of the domain promotes offshoreclicks... anyone know how to get ahold of them?

CP sucks.

Alex

He does also own 18teeny.com (root redirects there) so blacklist that one too

As a parent I find it absolutely incredible that any parent would allow their child to be photographed like this, and even more incredible that they would allow these pics to be posted on an internet site which charges people to go and look at the pics.

Are they so totally ignorant of what is going on in the world around them? Who do they think is going to buy a subscription to a site full of scantily clad young girls.

The whole mentality of child models, beauty pagents and all of the other exploitative crap that goes on in America (having said that I am sure it goes on elsewhere, its just such a big thing in the states) makes me sick! Kids should be out playing, not posing and teasing like mini adults on catwalks and on websites.

(I came across one of these so called 'model' sites a couple of weeks ago, and by backing out of it ended up at some 'not so innocent' sites, all from European countries. I reported them to ASCAP and was told that whilst these sites were questionable they were not illegal in those countries and they couldnt touch them.
WTF!! )

So while governments are cracking down on pornography, there are thousands of these young kids being primped, preened, displayed and exploited under the guise of 'modelling' and 'beauty pagents'. Who is looking out for them?

I know I am preaching to the converted here, just needed to get it off my chest

that really sucks, if you grabbed the ip used to submit maybe you could notify the ISP also.

Exactly DD.

I'd really love to put my hands on one of these bastards.

believe it or not this crap is legal. i saw an article on-line on yahoo or somewhere, about childsupermodels the biggest site of this type. however, you got him if he really did submit it to you himself, and not someone trying to set him up. the reason for this is that the site with the young girls are legal only because it is technically not for sexual gratification and to promote the girl as a model. so if he submitted the site to a porn link list he fucked himself completely. so i would say if you have his ip etc, and can prove its him then, you have cracked these bastards once and for all, let the FBI know what you have i am sure they would be interested.|skull|

Yeah, seeing that shit just reminds me of how their are some really sick people in this world. Worst part about that content is technically, I believe it is legal and not considered CP. So far as I know, a child modeling in her underwear or even nude can be considered "art" under the law. It is when children pose sexually provocatively or engage in sexual acts, real or simulated that it becomes CP.

Either way, I hate all that shit and know content like that only serves to fuel the sick passions of pedophiles. Very sad that people feel the need to promote sites like that.

Its makes me sad that this shit is legal and it makes me insane that the parents are so proud that their children are on the net, posing.

I saw a TV-documentary about these so called model sites and these parents are so fucking deranged that you would not believe your ears what came out of their mouths.

I think that when you take advantage of a child, in either way that might be, it’s should be illegal, period, and that is something that Ascroft guy should be hunting down instead of going after the free speech.

hey mist where did you see this documentary, i would be interested to see it. i was wondering what these parents were like. i can't believe they would go on tv an admit what they do.

babymaker, here is a link to the article I was referring to when I quoted the FBI statistics

http://chblue.com/artman/publish/article_501.shtml

it might give you a little bit of insight into what these parents are thinking

damn, that is the article i saw before, i was wondering where i found it. these parents are crazy, i think ashcroft shuld go watch them!

Babymaker, I don’t live in the US so I did not see it there, and I don’t remember which production company the channel I saw it on, bought it from, it was like 2 months ago I believe.

It's hosted in Russia.

|whisper|