Quality vs. Quantity?
 

Is it better to spend alot of time making a few sites good and trying to get alot of hits, or just make alot of sites good enough and feed them traffic.
-----
Like work hard on a link list or TGP to get traffic and submitters?
or
Make alot of LL's or TGP's that have links to just sponsor galleries or sites, Then buy some traffic and see how productive it gets.
-----
Making free sites with alot of mirrors with recips to LL's that send a little traffic.
or
Making a free site with about 8 recips from the LL's that send the most traffic.
-----
Also about the content thats on your sites is it better to say we have 20,000+ Galleries, or to say we only have 5,000 of higher quality images?
-----

Any one?

The guys who are making the money today and tomorrow are the ones going the quality route.

The days of the poor site are numbered IMHO.

I have been promoting quality over quantity for years now.

Just from the people I have talked to who run CJ sites, I have found many sites who are doing double and triple the traffic I am, yet only a 1/3 -1/4 of the sales.

Slow and steady always wins the race.

Quality combined with originality works for me :)

Build for the long term ya cant go wrong :) Take it slow and steady :)

Do you think SE folks read these boards?
Slow and steady, hand created, hand submitted.
Yeah I know, it takes a ton of time, but can't tell me making a site of a naked lady is Work :)

Do both :)

For the 1st month, build 30 killer sites/templates & then re-use them. You'll find that you got a majority of the work done in the 1st month & all you'll have to do is tweak the templates the next time you build :)

I prefer quality over quantity, leaving conversions etc. I just feel better after 6-7 hours with building a quality free site , its kind of satisfaction...