Please critque this freeisite
 

http://www.fightingsluts.com/lltc/040327/

This is my latest freesite. I am hoping I can get some input on it.

Obviously I still need to add the LL recips in the index and link up the title18 sec 2257

Thanks in advance

--Gel

Doesn't look too bad to me... one bit of advice... lose the random numbers in the link. To me it looks like a autogenerated gallery. This is something alot of TGPs use and when I'm in a hurry trying to do reviews, I often delete links that look like that because 9 times out of 10 they are a gallery.

Other than that, looks ok.

marc
hoes.com

Looks fine other then as MB said about losing the random numbers. Name your directories and pages with keywords instead.

Interesting.

Actually they aren't random
lltc is my code for the site being submitted to Link Lists
040327 well that's todays date

It just makes it so much easier to read my logs and stats.
It's worked pretty well for me for the last couple of years.
I'd hate to have to drop my organization method.

I guess I have some thinking to do.

Thank you for your input.

Do you see any other improvment that could be made?

I would love to see more sites like that submitted to **************.. in fact if I was buying freesite templates I could use that as an example of what I wanted..

Two small things I would add is a copyright footer linking to the domain root, or a hub page, from the botton of each page of your site.... and a "second" choice sponsor link on the main page or under gallery 2 to catch surfers that want that niche but have some objection to the main sponsor site.. (by that I mean a link something like this I Love Lesbian Sites - Read My Member Site Reviews )

btw.. if you are concerned that LLs wont realise /032704/ is a date and not a random number.. you could make it more obvious with something like /04mar27/ if that still works with your stats reading... but imho you are better to use descriptive words as folder names if you can live without the handy stats.

To be honest I can't claim credit for the design. It was put together by a business partner of mine. I'll pass on your comments to her. Maybe you two could get together.

Good tip on the secondary sponsor and the date.

Cleo or Mark

Would www.vanilla-thumbs.com/lltc/04mar27/ be more acceptable?

That would be better, but it is more to do with setting off a red flag more then actually preventing you from getting listed. The real issue is that IMHO you are hurting yourself with the SEs by doing it this way.

Something like http://www.kinky-cleo.com/porn/fetis...stocking/site/ :D

Since no one stated the obvious, let me say it loud and clear - you can make 3 free sites with 60 pics and not just one.

Instead of having 3 galleries with 20 pics each, make 2 galleries with 10 pics each.

Oh, and lose the exit link, you don't need that |angry|

Peace

Looks good to me, I'd list it.

I do agree with Priest though, you can make more sites out of it and losing the exit link wouldn't hurt.

agreed on the ammount of content and on the exit link i would suggest at least something non adult in there cuz as it is now it is completely useless. if they are worried enough to click the exit - seeing another adult site will prolly panic and just close it altogether. i have found that those eraser programs work well on exit links

Actually the exit link should be going to a non adult humor page of mine. I entered the url incorrectly so your seeing my 404 page.

About the amount of content. I can certainly cut that back.

I do have a question about breaking up a set like this. I have been leary of making multible freesitees from a set like this. I would imagine the second time I submit a freesite using pictures from this set the reviewer going to think "I just saw this set last week" and reject it. At a galnce the content will look the same and I doubt a reviewer will take the time to see if I am using differentpics from the same set or just reusing the same pics.

Might just hang on to the pics for a month or so - use the rotating system that is usually recommended here - 30 templates for a months worth of sites and then repeat - most reviewers wont remember the content after a month and if they do - it's probably cause someone else is using it :)