how overused is this content? [little april]
 

I find that little april girl very hot, and was curious if her content is overused on the big linklists. they have over 1000 promo pics so i would think its not toooo overused, but she is hot so i dunno :P

anyways, will someone fill m in on this? i want to make free sites for her but not if i wont get listed for overused content.

littleapril.com incase you dont know who im talking about

thanks guys! |bananna| DANCE BANANA! DANCE!

I don't have any sites of her on my LL yet. ;)

post a pic of her |rasta|

Hi Neticule,

First of all....love the sig!! Being a parent, I can totally relate.

On the question of the content. I don't get a lot of sites submitted with that content, so I haven't seen any over-saturation of it. That said, I don't list her galleries anyway. It is just one of those things for me. She looks VERY young, and has always been promoted that way.|sad|

But, good luck with your sites.

It's not overused yet, but it is on my radar.

I've accepted some of her stuff and rejected other for her looking too young. Yes I know she is old enough, doesn't matter.

For Link Lists I think she is still fine. TGPs? Forget it. Most all use her hosted galleries now.

Everyone has their own personal line in the sand when it comes to porn. :)

If anyone has any questions about Little April, feel free to contact me.
Cheers...

I stopped accepting those sites to hoes.com over a month ago.

Way overused in my opinion.

marc

It says clearly in her site that she is 18, but Cleo is right, she looks very young.

I look at it the same way that I look at anime content. Especially in these days of Photoshop where it is not that hard to mess with a person's age. My rules are simple in that I don't list anything that isn't of age or implies that the model isn't of age.

I wouldn't list young looking ladies dressed up in kid's clothing playing at a playground either and in fact rejected such a site this week.

Making a model look so young that you end up catering to people looking for cp is just plain wrong in my opinion. IMO LittleApril is very borderline in some of her content.

Now I started to be afraid that panty site I built today can be rejected. Model don't look too young but has lollipop in her mouth in some pics and plaid skirt. I haven't posted it yet, as after vacation I'm not in day routine yet and after building it I had to take a snap. After that I thought WTF, I post it tomorrow morning.

Summer is summer. It was raining as hell all vacation but now it's more than +25C (77F) and raising. We don't have air conditiong in our houses so I think I must go to our car as soon as my wife comes back from day job, lol!
|bananna|

Well, I try my luck tomorrow morning. He who dare don't play.

Little April Related

I posted this you guys may be interested or even shed some light on this, |shake|

I just rejected some Little April sites, because while I know that she is 18 I feel alot like Cleo does. Dressing her up in what look like little girl panties and taking pics of her playing on a playground is just not something I want to promote, and definitely where my line is. I don't have a problem with most teen sites as long as they are legal and NOT dressed up and made up to appear to be 12 or 13 years old.

I rejected a Little April site the other day. Mostly because of structural flaws. I don't like to have my surfer's stolen. |sad|

We dont list any Little April sites simply because like Cleo said she is promoted as being young, way too young. Most of the sites we have seen she was dressed up to look about 12. In our opinion thats still out of line regardless of the age of the model. Just our 2c though, everyone has to make their own decisions, it is your business after all.

I sse your point ansd its why I choose some regukar content. I remember some time ago when 'Teen Kelly' hit the web and the same debates went on.

Personally I chose not to promote LA for some time though after reading the sales ratios etc I made a COMMERCIAL desicision to start promoting this site.

Has it worked for me? We to be frank yes, it still converts 1/63 for me now as a small webmaster thats revenue I have to welcome with open arms.

Im not into them making her appear really fucking young however it does clearly state shes over 18. I have to raise the point of 'dressing people to make em look younger/different' its massive in the fetish niche. Grown adults dressing as school kinds and babies etc.

Weather I like it or not this site sells, OK so it dont rebill but it does sell. LA is nothing new theres a 100 sites just like hers some are even worse for making the 'young' statement youngporn springs to mind.

LA is teen lesbian site nothing more nothing less, the models are compliant and over 18, it dont look like my free siute is getting listed any how, which kind of sucks but thats life |sad|

I created several free-sites about LA two months ago and posted to aprox. 90 link lists and nobody rejected me.
I don't post my sites to Cleo by the way.

And how do you feel promoting a woman who looks about 15 in many of her pics?

What kind of men are turned on by a woman dressed up to look about 15 years old?

Shes not 15 nor does she look 15 - christ if you look at her pictures its plain as bloody day shes a grown women - its a matter of opion, she looks how she is decribed;

Petite, lesbian BUT legal. There is massive debate in my Yahoo group that Little April has several different models possing as Apirl or that the images within the site have been altered as birth marks and boob sizes differ!

I said earleir about this I choose to promote LA for commercial reasons - she sells if we are being moral then the japanese toon sex is WAY out of line as the charactors are always young and the schenes are nasty.