|
RawAlex, Hogtied/Cybernetbucks doesn't rape women to get their content. The context they provide for their sites is that of consentual domination and submission. In the Ragsdale case you cited, the Ragsdales described their content as depicting real rapes. I doubt if they were (or they would have been prosecuted for rape), but that's the context the Ragsdales provided. We all have to draw our own line in the grey areas. Your line is easy because your government drew it for you - no bondage in conjunction with penetration. Personally, I would not MAKE a site like that, but I don't see much risk in accepting links to them. If my government decided to go after those sites, they'd target the content producers and the actual owners of the sites long before they'd think about trying to prosecute those who simply linked to them.
|