Quote:
Originally posted by ChristyB
That's very true urb (Matt - lol - URA perv) 
On the original subject though... I have a bitch about that which struck me earlier this evening!
When I search Google for 'porn' I see that 'Free ****** Porn' is ranked ahead of me (and it really pisses me off)!
So I'm wondering - and it's probably naiive of me - how is it Google are allowed to provide links to sites named using cp terms with impunity?
Is there some law that says they are allowed to be impartial?
Is it because - despite they can supposedly tell enough about a web page to niche it / rank it / understand it & calculate its incoming & outgoing link relativity - they can't tell whether its providing cp or information about the subject & related matters???
... even with a site is entitled 'free ****** porn' ???
Isn't it true that any other organisation - in any country where cp is illegal - that openly lists links to sites advertising the provision of cp would be subject to investigation and prosecution?
sorry for the ramble but I can't help feeling I must've missed something obvious - (paranoia - everybody thinks that about me) - and I can't be bothered to go search for the answer - so I thought I'd look stupid & ask out loud 
|
'Loli*a' is a name of book by Vladimir Nabokov, and they still sell that book. I can lend that book from library. There is also two movies done by that book, and at least one soundtrack CD from newer movie. Also there is at least one audio CD in this world named 'Lola, Loli*a'. I don't know what the content is, but you can buy it from Amazon.
I believe the word is used in many places that have nothing to do with porn, so Google can't ban it.
Here in Finland, at 70's, we had the rock group named 'Virtanen' (Smith in english). Their biggest hit was 'Loli*a'.
BTW, there is one celebrity whose first name is Loli*a...but what was last name?