Greenguy's Board - View Single Post

neticule · 2005-04-11, 12:23 PM

I do agree there has to be some limit. However. The images I use are supposed to reflect the quality of the paysite im promoting, this example being Met Art. I download the high quality images from Met which are often 3000 pixels wide, and 500KB plus. Great quality stuff. I have to do my best to get them under 100kb, which I have no problem with. Im able to keep nice quality in my images at 1024 pixels, If I had to lower the quality, or make them 600 pixels, I believe very much that that would reflect badly on the sponsor in the surfers POV, they dont know that the quality is that much better at the paysite, they go off of what they see. Atleast for the most part.

I do feel for modem users, and im sorry you had to be on a modem for so long swed, but it will be a cold day in hell when my images reflect the sponsor poorly, if it takes the modem surfers twice as long to download the image, so be it, atleast they get quality, and that reflects on the sponsor.

It really is kind of hard in a set of 20-30 images, because optimized just the same, one image may be 55kb, while another image (say, with a tree that has alot of leaves in the background) will be 95kb. If I had to make the maximum 50kb, then images such as this would look very awful, or be very small...

Hope you understand where IM coming from, I do understand where you as a reviewer on a modem are coming from.

2005-04-11, 12:23 PM	#8
neticule A boy without mischief is like a bowling ball without a liquid center Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 437	I do agree there has to be some limit. However. The images I use are supposed to reflect the quality of the paysite im promoting, this example being Met Art. I download the high quality images from Met which are often 3000 pixels wide, and 500KB plus. Great quality stuff. I have to do my best to get them under 100kb, which I have no problem with. Im able to keep nice quality in my images at 1024 pixels, If I had to lower the quality, or make them 600 pixels, I believe very much that that would reflect badly on the sponsor in the surfers POV, they dont know that the quality is that much better at the paysite, they go off of what they see. Atleast for the most part. I do feel for modem users, and im sorry you had to be on a modem for so long swed, but it will be a cold day in hell when my images reflect the sponsor poorly, if it takes the modem surfers twice as long to download the image, so be it, atleast they get quality, and that reflects on the sponsor. It really is kind of hard in a set of 20-30 images, because optimized just the same, one image may be 55kb, while another image (say, with a tree that has alot of leaves in the background) will be 95kb. If I had to make the maximum 50kb, then images such as this would look very awful, or be very small... Hope you understand where IM coming from, I do understand where you as a reviewer on a modem are coming from. __________________ Mom, I'm done! Come wipe!