Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RawAlex
...a softcore image in a series of hardcore images could be contrued as being part of a sexuality explicit photoset.
|
Definitely some food for thought. Under that interpretation even if I had a 100% non-explicit adult site, I'd still need to have to a statement from the original producer of each "set" stating that it is non-explicit. That's where I begin to have constitutional issues with 2257. This quickly becomes a situation of guilty until proven innocent.
I wish the FSC success in getting the court to throw this out.