2005-05-24, 05:55 PM
|
#53
|
|
Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Tommy, I love the idea. I have already in the past asked sponsor program to provide information regarding their sponsor content, and how they will handle this situation. I am sure that some will provided the needed documents, and others will ask for all content to be removed (effectively removing the right to use the content).
Boogie, text links, text based sites, and such have NOTHING to do with 2257, except possibly for images using in site design, advertising, and such (and advertising is questionable, as it is not "editorial" material).
bdld: Linking to a movie a picture, whatever, if you link to something on your own servers, then you need documentation for each performer and all the rest that goes with it. Image, movie, clip, flash, whatever... the rules are the same. If you publish it, you are responsble for it - no matter who actually created it.
The issue is most problematic when we talk about thumbtgps - even something like remotely served thumbs. If you publish them (make the integral to your site) are you in fact a secondary producer? I think that without proof to the contrary, everything that appears to be on your domain is going to be your problem.
We will see.
Alex
|
Alex, if I use a system like Remote Thumbs are you still consider a secondary producer even if they are located in Panana? |
|
|