Let me see if I've got this right:
1) I have to go back through all my domains and document every "picture trail" with a specific URL to each individual pic on every site/gallery/page/whathaveyou created or published since July 1995.
2) From this day forward I have to continue that ridiculously anal retentive documentation process for each and every page I upload and allow public access to.
3) I'm expected to publish my home address on the Internet (WTF?!?) for any Tom, Dick, or psycho serial killer to get their hands on (a VERY scary prospect for the females in this industry no matter which side of the camera they are on!! I thought this degree of privacy intrusion was left to those convicted of ch*ld molestation!)
4) If I use sponsor content, I have to go to that sponsor and acquire from them the model releases/personal information and keep that at my "place of business" (which can't be my PO Box anymore apparently)
Alex, you seem to have a good handle on this BS. Did I miss anything?
I'm not even going to start on how potentially detrimental these changes will be to everyone in terms of time, personnel and, ultimately, revenue streams; that's a rant that could go on for hours.
It's my humble opinion that we need both lawyers and the ACLU involved here... I see some blatant privacy law violations in this mess, both for WMs and models. Some information has no business being made available for public consumption, and there are very good reasons for that! I've read several of Juggernaut's posts, for example, in which he has detailed some of the weirdos his wife has to deal with as a cam girl. How's he going to feel knowing that he has to publish their home address on the Web?
The whole thing gives me the willies |shocking| Here's hoping to FSC achieves a great deal of success in their fight to stop the DOJ from getting away with this!
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, "I drank what?"
|