Quote:
|
Originally Posted by swedguy
Google Images also publishes the thumb. Both could be considered "electronic communication service providers" (traffic sources). Google Images and a thumb TGP is basically the same thing, except Google Images has more ads than a thumb TGP.
But this part may be where a thumb TGP get included as publisher:
snipped from the section Sinistress posted: "...editorial or managerial decisions concerning the sexually explicit content of a computer site or service"
A thumb TGP makes editoral decisions regarding what they post, SE's don't.
|
Doesn't google (or any other search engine) make an editorial decision (based on their algorithms if not human intervention) on what kind of content from what site they publish?
As it is google uses our content (without any regards to copyrights) to sell its own advertisments around and now they should be exempt from a law that nearly puts half of us out of business?
Okay, I may sound pretty cheesed about it. I just paid a fortune to my lawyer |shocking|