Commentary:
If you read my last two posts carefully you will see that I take two stances. In one post, I dont believe we should have age docs, but in the other I say we do.
As I write this post, the thread has 421 posts and 8702 views.(Is this a record?)
When you look at the two stances I took, and the number of people interested in this thread, its easy to see the new regs are so confusing that everyone is having a hard time interrupting them, even the lawyers.
This is not legal advice, this "cover your ass" advice:
1. Get a First Admendment Attorney
2. Get docs on all your content
3. Get your cross referencing database built
4. No matter what you believe to be true, want to be true, or talk yourself into believing what should be true, take your lawyers advice on how to get compliant, and have it done by June 23.
If you have to beg, borrow, steal, pick up cans, mow yards and take a temp job, get the money together and
get a lawyer.
I say this for one reason only. I have regular submitters that I recognize. Its obvious that they have made the change with their 2257 statement to comply with the new regs. After several days and hundreds of posts in various threads, on various boards, they still have it wrong. If you are listening to people on the boards to get your legal advice, your getting started on the wrong foot.
GET A LAWYER
Rawalex, what trooper you are. Thanks for all your help
-