|
Did I read Jay's newsletter wrong, Mr Yum?
What did paragraph one of the attorney's letter tell you? It told me that he says he is qualified to render an opinion on 2257 matters. Well, I would assume that is why Jay is paying him to write a useless letter.
Paragraph two said nothing that the average webmaster did not already know - The new regulations could be struck down based on the findings in Sundance Assocs. Inc. v. Reno.
Hell, Jay did not even say what position OC Cash was taking. I think he was trying to say, "At this time, we choose to do nothing different because we thing the regulations will not hold up in court based on Sundance Assocs. Inc. v. Reno." If that is the case, a simple post to one of the many 2257 thread would have been sufficient and his post would not have ended up in the spam forum.
I try not to make controversial posts, but Jay's post here and his original newsletter added nothing worthwhile to the 2257 discussion. Perhaps he will have something interesting to say as things play out in the coming weeks.
So Jay has hired a high dollar attorney and the attorney is stroking Jay to earn his fee. Many of us are in that boat but it is not newsworthy or helpful to fellow webmasters.
__________________
|