Greenguy's Board - View Single Post

Bill · 2005-06-23, 02:58 PM

It's not that unusual.

I didn't check your source, but first be sure you didn't include the no cache tag.

But what it probably means is that google hasn't spidered your site often enough to give it enough age to warrant a cache.

I gather google's new patent talks about ways to filter sites by age and traffic, in effect the so-called "sandbox" penalty. But these parts of the new patent have other implications, and may be what causes some of the recent surge in "url only" listings, and stuff like your not having a cached page.

Bottom line is, google is ranking and listing sites with an emphasis on age and history now. In time your site will show a cache.

(unless you have the no cache tag on it...)

2005-06-23, 02:58 PM	#4
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	It's not that unusual. I didn't check your source, but first be sure you didn't include the no cache tag. But what it probably means is that google hasn't spidered your site often enough to give it enough age to warrant a cache. I gather google's new patent talks about ways to filter sites by age and traffic, in effect the so-called "sandbox" penalty. But these parts of the new patent have other implications, and may be what causes some of the recent surge in "url only" listings, and stuff like your not having a cached page. Bottom line is, google is ranking and listing sites with an emphasis on age and history now. In time your site will show a cache. (unless you have the no cache tag on it...)