Greenguy's Board - View Single Post

RBC · 2005-06-25, 08:09 PM

Some excellent posts here in this thread some funny, some succinct with the state of affairs.

The one thing that has a bug up my ass about 2257 is the major lack of efficient design in interpreting the letter of the law with regard to record keeping. After all, the one thing all the attorney's agree is the ambiguous design of 2257. Going after CP seems to me to be the mantra statement but in truth, don't think so.
More or less it's a witch hunt for whomever the DoJ really wants to go after. The law reads like bad improvised jazz and the DOJ wants to keep it nice and confusing so when the day comes its all about interpretation.

It will surely be interesting to see how this plays out.

2005-06-25, 08:09 PM	#44
RBC Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 25	Some excellent posts here in this thread some funny, some succinct with the state of affairs. The one thing that has a bug up my ass about 2257 is the major lack of efficient design in interpreting the letter of the law with regard to record keeping. After all, the one thing all the attorney's agree is the ambiguous design of 2257. Going after CP seems to me to be the mantra statement but in truth, don't think so. More or less it's a witch hunt for whomever the DoJ really wants to go after. The law reads like bad improvised jazz and the DOJ wants to keep it nice and confusing so when the day comes its all about interpretation. It will surely be interesting to see how this plays out.