Quote:
Originally Posted by sue-fl
Well it gets more confusing..
I do my text with the name of the site on the first line-then text-then click here or whatever. I usually don't use .com but started as of my last site with the .com. I don't really think it looks as good though but I'll do it that way from now on.
|
I don't think that way is a problem - as long as I can look at the link & figure out from surrounding text or a banner that it is going to a paysite, then it's not blind. The big issue is stuff like "CLICK HERE for more lesbo pics" - surfer may think he's going to another gallery or something & ends up at a paysite. I don't think your links are blind
I'm not going to add the .com - it just doesn't balance right most of the time.
and the large blocks of text - I know contrast is good to catch the surfer's eye, but 2 or 3 lines is more effective than 10 imo

I wouldn't decline a site for changing style on a mouseover (even if it blinded me lol) unless there were more than 3 or 4 lines.
Preacher - I like these discussions too

I think the problem is that it is subjective - one reviewer may decline what others accept, or even what they would accept if they were in a better mood
I have seen an increase in using the .com & paysite names in the last couple of days submissions, tho - it seems people are paying attention to these threads
Ponygirl