Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Gonzo, while agree with on most of your points taken on an individual case basis, the reality is a "whole ball of wax". In this ball of wax is a girl doing extreme bondage, soliciting for clients (for acts that most straight people would feel are at least somewhat sexual in nature, hence the revealing constumes, nudity, and the like), and a webmaster program that sends traffic into the mix from porn sites.
Nothing can be taken without context, and the context says "this is a porn site where the girl solicites for clients at $300 an hour, and then requires they are donations not fees". If this was above board, she would take the $300 as a hourly rate and not play games. By playing the old hooker game "it's not a price for sex, it's a donation to show appreciation for me", she puts herself in the same game.
Her traffic comes from porn. She acts like a hooker. She operates a "sexual" business receiving clients in a residential neighborhood. When she gets caught, she doesn't run to the S&M people for support, but tries to claim "porn webmaster" and tries to get the support of our industry.
Except for a webmaster program that cuts the webmasters out of the most profitable part of the business (the donations) she has little or nothing to do with our industry.
Oh yeah, while canaries are good, enough dead canaries can really stink a place up... especially when you didn't put them there to start with.
Alex
|
It doesnt matter...according to the 1st Amendment shes entitled to have that site up.
If shes pimping her ass on the side / which she says shes not/ thats an entirely different issue and Im sure that forensic van will get to the bottom of it.
It doesnt matter to me if shes hiding behind it...a ball of wax or a pile of dead birds. If the evidence concludes that shes a hooker then Im sure thats what she will be convicted of.
We have another saying in the US its "innocent until proven guilty". Right now shes just under investigation.
Anyone that knows me will tell you that I have a very vocal distaste for the scammers and thieves in this industry. Hell I just chimed in on a Zoo thread to call shaving what it really is....STEALING!
I agree with you, Tommy and Green Guy that it reflects bad on the entire industry BUT if she wasnt selling sex [like she says] then the only thing shes guilty of is bad business ethics.
Im shocked Im debating the legislation and enforcement of morality with someone else in this business.
Some of yall need to accept it like Tommy said.... we are all PORNOGRAPHERS! Your fooling yourself if you think anything else.
Yall are going to keep on and Ill come back into the B2B side of this business and it wont be pretty. hahaah